I've been reading about semi-algebraic sets and I've run into several examples of sets which have been proved to not be semi-algebraic. Examples include the integers, and the curves of the sine and exponential functions. I'm really curious about how you can prove that a set is not semi-algebraic. Does anyone know how its done?
2026-04-21 08:18:11.1776759491
how to prove that a set is not semi-algebraic
666 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How can one prove that this polynomial is non-negative?
- Does an irreducible real affine algebraic set/ its complement has finitely many connected components in the Euclidean topology?
- How to proof a real variety is not locally a manifold
- Characterizations of bounded real zero sets
- Why is the set of all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ satisfying $ x^2 - 8x + 15 \leq 0 $ representable as a polyhedron?
- Lebesgue measure of a semi-algebraic set
- Disjoint Union Basic-Closed Semialgebraic Sets
- Is union of matrices of different ranks a submanifold?
- Algebraic curves of odd degree - only finitely many lines through the origin fail to intersect
- Box-constrained orthogonal matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is a property of semi-algebraic sets which you can use to show that many sets are not semi-algebraic (including your examples):
Let $M \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ be a semialgebraic set such that the zero polynomial is the only polynomial in $\mathbb{R}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ that vanishes identically on $M$. Then $M$ has nonempty interior.
Take for example the integers $M=\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{R}$. Since every nonzero univariate polynomial has only finitely many zeros, only $0$ vanishes on $M$. But $M$ has empty interior, thus $M$ is not semialgebraic.
The same argument works for the sine: if you intersect the graph with the line $y=0$, you get infinitely many intersection points.
For the graph of the exponential function (which has also empty interior), you can also convince yourself that only the zero polynomial vanishes identically on it: Roughly, this follows from the fact that the exponential function grows faster than every polynomial.