A subspace with dimension strictly less than the dimension of vector space has (Lebesgue) $measure=0$. Let $V$ be a vector space with $dimension=n$. To show that some set $S$ in V is zero-measure, is it enough to show the existence of bijective projection between $S$ and a subset of a subspace of $V$ with $dimension < n$?
2026-03-14 13:38:51.1773495531
Is a bijective projection function measure preserving?
989 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-MEASURE
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
- Is $L^p(\Omega)$ separable over Lebesgue measure.
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- uncountable families of measurable sets, in particular balls
- Joint CDF of $X, Y$ dependent on $X$
- Show that $ Tf $ is continuous and measurable on a Hilbert space $H=L_2((0,\infty))$
- True or False Question on Outer measure.
- Which of the following is an outer measure?
- Prove an assertion for a measure $\mu$ with $\mu (A+h)=\mu (A)$
Related Questions in DESCRIPTIVE-SET-THEORY
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- For any countable ordinal $\alpha$, there is some closed set of reals whose Cantor-Bendixson rank is $\alpha$
- how to construct a rudimentary function $h$ used in the paper ''scales in $L(\mathbb{R})$''
- Under $MA+\neg CH$ there exists a $Q$-set.
- Separating closed sets in the bubble space. (a.k.a Moore plane a.ka. Niemytzki plane.)
- Precision on the Baire property
- Uniqueness in Baire property representation for compact Hausdorff spaces
- Can height of tree more than $\aleph_0$
- Example of a unit circle subset that is $F_{\sigma\delta}$ but not $F_\sigma$
- Finite approximations to transfinite sums of real numbers.
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-MEASURE-THEORY
- Lipschitz continuous function whose derivative is not continuous almost everywhere
- Relative volume of $\delta$-fattening (neighborhood) of a compact set
- Surface Area in $R^n$
- Excess of Caccioppoli sets
- What type of measure is this?
- Lipschitz extension of affine function to whole space
- Is it true $\mu (A+B) = \mu (A) + \mu(B) $ for bounded sets $ A, B \subset R $
- The Lebesgue measure as energy minimizer?
- Caratheodory's construction
- Upper Bounding Hausdorff Measure
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No. As shown in Lebesgue Measure of the Graph of a Function, there exists a function $f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ whose graph $G = \{(x,f(x)) : x \in \mathbb{R}\}$ is a Lebesgue non-measurable subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$. But if we let $\pi(x,y) = (x,0)$ be projection onto the $x$ axis, then $\pi|_G : G \to \mathbb{R}$ is bijective.
If you can first show that your set $S$ is measurable, then it will have measure zero. This can be shown using Fubini's theorem.
Let $E$ be a proper subspace of $V$ and let $\pi : V \to E$ be orthogonal projection onto $E$. Suppose that $\pi|_S$ is injective. Let $F$ be the orthogonal complement of $F$. Then Lebesgue measure $m$ on $V$ is the product measure of the Lebesgue measures $m_{E}$, $m_{F}$ on $E,F$ respectively. Now by Fubini's theorem, we can write $$m(S) = \int 1_S\,dm = \int_E \int_F 1_S(x+y) \,m_F(dx) \,m_E(dy).$$ But by assumption, for each $y \in E$, there is at most one $x\in F$ such that $x+y \in S$. (If $x+y, x'+y \in S$, then $\pi(x+y)=\pi(x'+y)=y$. Since $\pi$ is injective on $S$, we have $x+y=x'+y$, hence $x=x'$.) Hence the function $x \mapsto 1_S(x+y)$ is zero almost everywhere, so $\int_F 1_S(x+y)\,m_F(dx) = 0$ for every $y \in E$. Thus the double integral on the right side is 0 and we conclude $m(S) =0 $.
If you don't want to require $\pi$ to be orthogonal projection, then the result is still true but you have to include a Jacobian factor in the double integral. The details are slightly tedious.