Let $\mathbb{K}G$ be a group algebra and $R$ be the representation ring(Grothendieck Ring) of $\mathbb{K}G$, that means the product of $R$ is the tensor product of representations, add is the direct sum of representations. So are $\mathbb{K}G$ and $R$ Morita equivalent(morita equivalent for rings rather than tensor categories)? If true, I need to find a right $\mathbb{K}G$-module $M$, how do I to find it?
2026-03-25 23:41:13.1774482073
Morita equivalent about group algebra and representation ring
58 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in MORITA-EQUIVALENCE
- State-sum construction of the Drinfeld center of a fusion 2-category
- Condition for an equivalence of functor categories
- Is the nilpotent exponent of the Jacobson radical of algebra a Morita equivalent invariant?
- Isomorphisms of the tensor product of $\mathcal{A}^N$
- Why is the bicategory viewpoint useful?
- Is it true that any algebra is Morita equivalent to oposite?
- Morita theory for presheaf (functor) categories
- Asking for references on commutation and morita equivalence
- Morita equivalent about group algebra and representation ring
- Rigidity of finitely generated projective modules
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Well typically $R$ is just a ring, whereas $\mathbb{K}[G]$ is a $\mathbb{K}$-algebra. So they don't really have a chance of being Morita equivalent. We could look at $R \otimes \mathbb{K}$ though, so let's do that. For simplicity I will assume $\mathbb{K}$ is algebraically closed, but I don't think it changes much.
If $\mathbb{K} = \mathbb{C}$ (or some other algebraically closed field of characteristic zero) then $\mathbb{C}G$ and $R \otimes \mathbb{C}$ are both semisimple with the same number of Artin-Weddurburn blocks ($\#$conjugacy classes many), so they are Morita equivalent. Alternatively: A semisimple $\mathbb{K}$-algebra is Morita equivalent to its center, and character theory provides an isomorphism between $Z(\mathbb{C}[G])$ and $R \otimes \mathbb{C}$.
If $\mathbb{K}$ is algebraically closed of characteristic $p$ dividing $|G|$ then $\mathbb{K}G$ is not semisimple. Its semisimplification $\mathbb{K}G/J(\mathbb{K}G)$ has ($\#$ $p'$ conjugacy classes) blocks. $R \otimes \mathbb{K}$ on the other hand is a commutative algebra of dimension ($\#$ $p'$ conjugacy classes). If its semisimple then it can't be Morita equivalent to something non-semisimple, and if it isn't semisimple then its semisimplification $R \otimes \mathbb{K}/ J(R \otimes \mathbb{K})$ has strictly smaller dimension so it can't be equivalent to $\mathbb{K}G/J(\mathbb{K}G)$. Either way we see they are not Morita equivalent in this case.