Let $\mathbb{K}G$ be a group algebra and $R$ be the representation ring(Grothendieck Ring) of $\mathbb{K}G$, that means the product of $R$ is the tensor product of representations, add is the direct sum of representations. So are $\mathbb{K}G$ and $R$ Morita equivalent(morita equivalent for rings rather than tensor categories)? If true, I need to find a right $\mathbb{K}G$-module $M$, how do I to find it?
2025-01-14 22:37:08.1736894228
Morita equivalent about group algebra and representation ring
58 Views Asked by popo https://math.techqa.club/user/popo/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- Number of necklaces of 16 beads with 8 red beads, 4 green beads and 4 yellow beads
- Proper and discontinuous action of a group
- Category Theory compared with Meta-Grammars (or Hyper-Grammars) in Programming Languages
- Prove a subgroup is normal
- Is a finite group $G$ determined by the sequence $p(G,k)$ of probabilities that $G$ is generated by $k$ random elements?
- Conjugacy classes for rotations of $D_{2n}$
- Understanding the concept
- To prove a statement about finite groups of even order.
- Normal subgroup of prime order in the center
- Showing that the groups (Q,+) and (Q⁺,*) are not isomorphic
Related Questions in MODULES
- Proper essential extensions
- If module $M = N + mM$, then why is $m(M/N) = M/N$?
- On the invariance of basis number
- Geometric intuition for coherent rings, modules, and sheaves
- Finitely generated iff direct limits of subobjects are bounded by subobjects
- Finding highest weight of a $gl(3)$ submodule of a $gl(4)$-module
- A simple Congruence Equation
- On the $R$-linear independence of free $R$-module
- Do all submodules of $R^n$ have a complement in $R^n$?
- Formulas give irreducible representation, $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$.
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- Conjugation preserves representation?
- linear representations, usual assumption
- Example of representation
- Simultaneously diagonalize the regular representation of C2 (+) C2 (+) C2.
- In what sense are the linear characters among the irreducible characters
- representation of sym^2(V)
- Proof that the induced class function $\theta^G$ is a character if $\theta$ is a representation on subgroup
- Character representation of right regular representation as sum of irreducible characters
- For simple $\mathbb C[G]$-modules is the representation unique
- Formulas give irreducible representation, $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$.
Related Questions in MORITA-EQUIVALENCE
- State-sum construction of the Drinfeld center of a fusion 2-category
- Is the nilpotent exponent of the Jacobson radical of algebra a Morita equivalent invariant?
- Isomorphisms of the tensor product of $\mathcal{A}^N$
- Why is the bicategory viewpoint useful?
- Is it true that any algebra is Morita equivalent to oposite?
- Morita theory for presheaf (functor) categories
- Asking for references on commutation and morita equivalence
- Morita equivalent about group algebra and representation ring
- Rigidity of finitely generated projective modules
- Let $R$ be a ring $P$ a projective generator of right $R$-modules. If $M$ is a left $A$-module, then $M \cong \text{Hom}_R(P, P \otimes_R M)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
Well typically $R$ is just a ring, whereas $\mathbb{K}[G]$ is a $\mathbb{K}$-algebra. So they don't really have a chance of being Morita equivalent. We could look at $R \otimes \mathbb{K}$ though, so let's do that. For simplicity I will assume $\mathbb{K}$ is algebraically closed, but I don't think it changes much.
If $\mathbb{K} = \mathbb{C}$ (or some other algebraically closed field of characteristic zero) then $\mathbb{C}G$ and $R \otimes \mathbb{C}$ are both semisimple with the same number of Artin-Weddurburn blocks ($\#$conjugacy classes many), so they are Morita equivalent. Alternatively: A semisimple $\mathbb{K}$-algebra is Morita equivalent to its center, and character theory provides an isomorphism between $Z(\mathbb{C}[G])$ and $R \otimes \mathbb{C}$.
If $\mathbb{K}$ is algebraically closed of characteristic $p$ dividing $|G|$ then $\mathbb{K}G$ is not semisimple. Its semisimplification $\mathbb{K}G/J(\mathbb{K}G)$ has ($\#$ $p'$ conjugacy classes) blocks. $R \otimes \mathbb{K}$ on the other hand is a commutative algebra of dimension ($\#$ $p'$ conjugacy classes). If its semisimple then it can't be Morita equivalent to something non-semisimple, and if it isn't semisimple then its semisimplification $R \otimes \mathbb{K}/ J(R \otimes \mathbb{K})$ has strictly smaller dimension so it can't be equivalent to $\mathbb{K}G/J(\mathbb{K}G)$. Either way we see they are not Morita equivalent in this case.