Let $G$ be a compact Lie group with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ and $T$ be a maximal torus with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{t}$. I read that the Weyl group $W$ of $G$ is "the group of automorphisms of $T$ which are restrictions of inner automorphism of $G$": $N(T)/T$ where $N(T)$ is the normaliser of $T$. Now I have trouble seeing why/how this is related to the symmetries of the roots of the adjoint action of $\mathfrak{t}$ on the complexidied of $\mathfrak{g}$. Can someone help me here? Or is it a too general question? Thank you
2026-04-06 08:07:00.1775462820
Weyl group of a compact Lie group vsWeyl group of a root system
273 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in ROOT-SYSTEMS
- At most two values for the length of the roots in an irreducible root system
- coefficients of the sum of roots corresponding to a parabolic subgroup
- Why is a root system called a "root" system?
- The Weyl group of $\Phi$ permutes the set $\Phi$
- $sn: W\rightarrow \{1,-1\},sn(\sigma)=(-1)^{l(\sigma)}$ is a homomorphism
- Isomorphism question if base $\Delta$ for a root system is equal to the set of positive roots.
- Order of $z\in Z(W)\backslash \{\rm{id}\}$ for $W$ the Weyl group.
- Every maximal toral subalgebra is the centralizer of some $1$-dimensional subalgebra
- What is a Minimal Parabolic Subalgebra?
- Serre's theorem
Related Questions in WEYL-GROUP
- The relationship between the Weyl group and Isometries of a Maximal Flat
- $sn: W\rightarrow \{1,-1\},sn(\sigma)=(-1)^{l(\sigma)}$ is a homomorphism
- Weyl chambers associated to a root system
- Eigenvalues of elements of a Weyl group
- Identify some Coxeter group
- Find a special element in weyl group
- Automorphism in Weyl group of root system and its extension to Lie algebra
- Realizing automorphism in Weyl group as automorphism of Lie algebra
- Conjugating the longest element of a parabolic subgroup by longest element in larger parabolic?
- What is the order of the Weyl group?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The nLab article is correct but, of course, is very much incomplete (and it is not meant to be complete). The definition you should get out of their article is that $$ W≃N_G(T)/T, $$ as an abstract group. In fact, there is more to this formula, as it also gives you the standard linear representation of $W$: You let $N_G(T)$ act on the Lie algebra ${\mathfrak t}$ of $T$ via the adjoint representation (the linearization of the action of $N_G(T)$ on $T$ by conjugation). The kernel of this linear representation of $N_G(T)$ is exactly $T$ and, hence, you obtain the standard linear representation of $W$.
Connecting this to root systems is a very long story and many books are written on it. It is too long to be reproduced here. In brief: There is a canonical $W$-invariant (positive-definite) inner product on ${\mathfrak t}$, obtained by restricting the Killing form on ${\mathfrak g}$. One then studies codimension 1 subspaces (called "walls") in ${\mathfrak t}$ which are fixed by nontrivial elements of $W$. (In terms of the normalizer $N_G(T)$, the walls correspond to the codimension 1 subgroups of $T$ which have larger centralizer than the entire $T$.) These elements are involutions (since they are orthogonal transformations with codimension 1 fixed-point sets). The walls divide ${\mathfrak t}$ into connected components, called "chambers" and one proves that $W$ acts simply-transitively on the set of chambers. Then one picks one of the chambers $\Delta$ (called a positive chamber) and proves that $W$ is generated by reflections fixing the walls passing the codimension 1 faces of $\Delta$. These are called simple reflections in $W$. Roots of the root system of $G$ (or or ${\mathfrak g}$) are certain (carefully chosen) linear functionals on ${\mathfrak t}$ whose kernels are the walls in ${\mathfrak t}$. Then one verifies that these linear functionals satisfy a certain set of axioms, which then one uses to define an abstract root system. Later on, one relates this to the root system of the complex Lie algebra ${\mathfrak g}^{\mathbb C}$, the complexification of ${\mathfrak g}$. One can easily spend the entire semester getting to this point.
As for references, you can use the ones from the nLab or from this Wikipedia article.
This is a freely available set of notes on the subject which I found simply by googling.