I'll state the question here:
If "$P(n): 2 \cdot 4^{2n + 1} + 3^{3n + 1}$ is divisible by $\lambda$, for all $n \in N$" is true, then what is the value of $\lambda$?
This is what I can think of:
$P(1): 2 \cdot 4^{2(1) + 1} + 3^{3(1) + 1}$ is divisible by $\lambda$.
i.e., $209$ is divisible by $\lambda$.
And,
$P(2): 2 \cdot 4^{2(2) + 1} + 3^{3(2) + 1}$ is divisible by $\lambda$.
i.e., $4235$ is divisible by $\lambda$.
Now the common factors of the $209$ and $4235$ are $1$ and $11$. So, $\lambda$ is one of $1$ and $11$. My textbook says that the answer is 11. And this how it was solved in the book.
Now I can't understand why can't the answer be $1$? Is doing what I did above enough to state the answer as $11$? What if for some $k \in N$, $2 \cdot 4^{2n + 1} + 3^{3n + 1}$ is not divisible by $11$? So to avoid missing such a term, I believe I should substitute $\lambda$ with $11$ in the statement and prove the statement using induction (that is what the chapter in my book is about). If I am able to prove it (and I will be since it's true), the answer is $11$. Otherwise, the answer is $1$.
My doubt is regarding the approach to the question. Does the method by which I solved it above suffice to give the answer as $11$? Or, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, do I have to prove the statement again by replacing $\lambda$ with $11$?
Hint $\ {\rm mod}\ 11\!:\,\ 8\cdot 16^n + 3\cdot \overbrace{ \color{#c00}{27}^n}^{\textstyle\color{#c00}{16}^n}\equiv 11\cdot 16^n\equiv 0\ $ by $\ \color{#c00}{27\equiv 16}\,$ & Congruence Power Rule.
Remark $ $ If modular arithmetic is unfamiliar then we can instead rewrite is as follows
$$ 3(27^n\!-16^n) + 11\cdot 16^n$$
which is divisible by $11$ by $\,11 = 27\!-\!16\mid 27^n\!-16^n$ (provable by induction or by invoking the Factor Theorem $\, a-b\mid a^n-b^n)$
Induction is also (implicitly) used in the modular proof because it uses $\,27\equiv 16\,\Rightarrow\, 27^n\equiv 16^n\,$ and the proof of this Congruence Power Rule is by induction on $\,n$.
Update $ $ OP seeks a direct inductive proof without modular arithmetic etc. Below is one.
$$\begin{align} f(n)\ &=\qquad 8\cdot 16^n +\, 3\cdot 27^n\\ \Rightarrow\ f(n\!+\!1)\ &=\, 8\cdot \color{#0a0}{16}\cdot 16^n +\, 3(\color{#0a0}{16}\!+\!11)\, 27^n\\ &=\, \color{#0a0}{16}\ \color{#c00}{f(n)}\ \ \ +\ \ \ 3\cdot \color{}{11}\cdot 27^n\\ &=\, \color{#c00}{11} (\color{#0a0}{16}\, \color{#c00}m\ \ +\,\ \ 3\cdot 27^n)\ \ {\rm by}\,\ \color{#c00}{f(n) = 11m}\,\ {\rm(inductive\ hypothesis)} \end{align}$$
therefore $\ f(n) = 11m\,\Rightarrow\, f(n\!+\!1) = \color{#c00}{11}k,\ $ i.e. $\,11\mid f(n)\,\Rightarrow\, 11\mid f(n\!+\!1)$.