I'm working with closed 3-dimensional manifolds $M_1$ and $M_2$. Consider their connected sum $M_1\#M_2$ and their gluing at only one point $M_1\vee M_2$. Intuitively I think that the map that contracts the boundary $\mathbb{S}^2$ of the ball used to make the connected sum to one point should induce an isomorphism in the fundamental groups but I don't really know how to prove this rigorously. Also, is the induced homomorphism in the $\pi_2$'s surjective? Basically my question is how can I prove that this map is 2-connected.
2026-03-31 19:12:58.1774984378
2-connected map between a connected sum and a gluing along one point.
209 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in HOMOTOPY-THEORY
- how to prove this homotopic problem
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Can $X=SO(n)\setminus\{I_n\}$be homeomorphic to or homotopic equivalent to product of spheres?
- Why do $S^1 \wedge - $ and $Maps(S^1,-)$ form a Quillen adjunction?
- Is $S^{n-1}$ a deformation retract of $S^{n}$ \ {$k$ points}?
- Connection between Mayer-Vietoris and higher dimensional Seifert-Van Kampen Theorems
- Why is the number of exotic spheres equivalent to $S^7,S^{11},S^{15},S^{27}$ equal to perfect numbers?
- Are the maps homotopic?
Related Questions in FUNDAMENTAL-GROUPS
- Help resolving this contradiction in descriptions of the fundamental groups of the figure eight and n-torus
- $f$ has square root if and only if image of $f_*$ contained in $2 \mathbb Z$
- Homotopic maps between pointed sets induce same group homomorphism
- If $H \le \pi_1(X,x)$ is conjugate to $P_*(\pi_1(Y, y))$, then $H \cong P_*(\pi_1(Y, y'))$ for some $y' \in P^{-1}(x)$
- Calculating the fundamental group of $S^1$ with SvK
- Monodromy representation.
- A set of generators of $\pi_1(X,x_0)$ where $X=U\cup V$ and $U\cap V$ path connected
- Is the fundamental group of the image a subgroup of the fundamental group of the domain?
- Showing that $\pi_1(X/G) \cong G$.
- Fundamental group of a mapping cone
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I think an application of Van Kampen's theorem should suffice to prove their fundamental groups are isomorphic. Glue in a ball $B$ to $M_1\# M_2$ on the boundary $S^2$ which you glued $M_1$ and $M_2$ along. Call this space $X$. Because the intersection of $B$ and $M_1\# M_2$ is $S^2$ (simply connected), and one of the spaces is contractible, this will not change the fundamental group.
[on second thought, the fact that $S^2$ is simply connected doesn't matter.]
Contracting the ball to a point is then a homotopy to the wedge sum and so their fundamental groups are isomorphic.
I'll think some more on the $\pi_2$ calculation and get back to you. Just some thoughts though. One would expect that pulling everything up in to the universal covers would be the best way to go. The universal cover of a connect sum of manifolds is just the universal covers of the punctured individual manifolds glued appropriately. It is also useful to know that the higher homotopy groups of a universal cover of a space are isomorphic to the homotopy groups of the space. Given that universal covers are simply connected, the Hurewicz theorem then implies that we can look at the second homology group instead of homotopy group which would make life easier as we could use Mayer-Vietoris.