A doubt in the proof "Period three implies chaos"

169 Views Asked by At

I'm working on the article by Lee and Yorke "Period three implies Chaos" and despite trying and understanding the proof, I can't understand how we can ensure that the set of subsequences defined on the proof of T2 Theorem 1 it is not empty. I suppose that if I undertand this, I will understand also the same in 2.2.

PDF File