We know that $A$ is a Hermitian matrix .So $A\pm iI$ are invertible. How do I prove that $U$ is diagonal given $U(A-iI)=(A+iI).$ I tried claiming that $A\pm iI$ is Hermiatian but it is not not. I also tried with calculations, but that leads nowhere.
2026-03-27 04:23:32.1774585412
A is a Hermitian matrix ,Is a matrix U diagonizable if U(A-iI)=(A+iI)
41 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in DIAGONALIZATION
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Show that $A^m=I_n$ is diagonalizable
- Simultaneous diagonalization on more than two matrices
- Diagonalization and change of basis
- Is this $3 \times 3$ matrix diagonalizable?
- Matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{4\times4}$ has eigenvectors $\bf{u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}$ satisfying $\bf{Au_1=5u_1,Au_2=9u_2}$ & $\bf{Au_3=20u_3}$. Find $A\bf{w}$.
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
- undiagonizable matrix and annhilating polynom claims
- Show that if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of matrix $A$ and $B$, then it is an eigenvalue of $B^{-1}AB$
- Is a complex symmetric square matrix with zero diagonal diagonalizable?
Related Questions in HERMITIAN-MATRICES
- Let $M$ be an $n \times n$ complex matrix. Prove that there exist Hermitian matrices $A$ and $B$ such that $M = A + iB$
- Product of two Hermitian matrices
- Eigenvectors of a Hermitian matrix
- Does matrix modulus satisfy triangle inequality for Loewner order?
- Prove sum of products of Hermitian matrices to be Hermitian
- What is dimension over $\mathbb R$ of the space of $n\times n$ Hermitian matrices?
- Nearest positive semidefinite matrix to a complex-valued Hermitian matrix
- SVD for Hermitian Matrix
- How does one prove the determinant inequality $\det\left(6(A^3+B^3+C^3)+I_{n}\right)\ge 5^n\det(A^2+B^2+C^2)$?
- A normal matrix with real eigenvalues is Hermitian
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Hermitian matrices are diagonalizable so $A=PDP^{-1}$ with $D$ diagonal and $P$ invertible. Then $U(A-iI)=(A+iI)$ implies $UP(D-iI)P^{-1}=P(D+iI)P^{-1}$ which implies $P^{-1}UP(D-iI)=D+iI$. From this, if we can show $D-iI$ is invertible then: $$P^{-1}UP=(D+iI)(D-iI)^{-1}$$ which is diagonal since the inverse of a diagonal matrix is diagonal and the product of diagonal matrices is diagonal. By contradiction let us assume that $D-iI$ is not invertible, then $i$ is an eigenvalue of $D$ and thus an eigenvalue of $A$, but this implies that $A-iI$ is not invertible, which is a contradiction.
The fact that $A+iI$ is invertible is not needed to prove that $U$ is diagonalizable, however it gives you that $U$ is not only diagonalizable but invertible, since it shows that $(D+iI)(D-iI)^{-1}$ is a diagonal matrix with no zeroes in the diagonal, thus $0$ is not an eigenvalue of $U$.