Is this proof acceptable ?
Theorem 1 (Wilson)
A positive integer $n$ is prime iff $(n-1)! \equiv -1 \pmod n$
Theorem 2
A positive integer $n$ is prime iff $\varphi(n)! \equiv -1 \pmod n$ .
Proof
Necessity : $\textit{If}~ n~ \textit{is prime}~ \textit{then}~\varphi(n)! \equiv -1 \pmod n $
If $n$ is prime then we have $\varphi(n) = n-1$ and
by Theorem $1$ : $(n-1)!=-1 \pmod n$ ,
hence $\varphi(n)! \equiv -1 \pmod n$ .
Sufficiency : $\textit{If}~\varphi(n)! \equiv -1 \pmod n ~ \textit{then}~ n~ \textit{is prime}$
For $n=2$ and $n=6$ :
$\varphi(2)! \equiv -1 \pmod 2$ and $2$ is prime .
$\varphi(6)! \not\equiv -1 \pmod 6$ and $6$ is composite .
For $n \neq 2,6$ :
Suppose $n$ is composite and $p$ is the least prime such that $p \mid n$ ,
then we have $\varphi(n)! \equiv -1 \pmod p$ .
Since $\varphi(n) \geq \sqrt{n}$ for all $n$ except $n=2$ and $n=6$ , see [1]
and $p \leq \sqrt{n}$ it follows $p \mid \varphi(n)!$ , hence $\varphi(n)! \equiv 0 \pmod p$ a contradiction .
Therefore , $n$ must be prime .
Reference
[1]: Mitrinović, D. S. and Sándor, J. Handbook of Number Theory. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1995.
It is correct.
If $n$ is composite then $\gcd(\phi (n)!,n)\geq p$ where $p$ denotes the smallest prime divisor of $n$.
Clearly $p$ is not equal to $-1$ mod n and therefore is true.
Nice one but not very helpfull in practice.