Hoping for some help with approaching the following problem:
As shown in the graphic, there are five nodes A,B,C,D,E and a set of directed edges. The "weights" are not scalars though but 2-dimensional vectors.
Let's image the nodes to be cities and the edges to be roads that connect the cities. Each road/edge has a length and a width (e.g. from A to B 1/1 and from B to C 1/0.8). The length is the (discrete) time it takes the cars to travel to the other city and the width is the proportion of cars that travel along this road (assuming the cars can be infinitely divided into pieces).
For example, let's assume 10 cars start from city A (and will never leave the "graph"). All 10 cars travel along the edge from A to B and it takes them one unit of time. At city B the 10 cars are divided and 0.8*10=8 cars travel along the edge B->C and it takes 1 time unit and 0.2*10=2 cars travel along edge B->D and it takes 0.5 time units.
Let's assume in each city there is some person who tracks how many cars travel through the city at each time unit (graphs beside the nodes, forget the graph for node D, ups).
If cars arrive at the same time in a city they add up again. So at any given time the sum of all cars must be 10.
How to formulate this problem?
Is there an analytical solution?
What is the long-term behavior of this "system? In other words, how would the "protocol" of the person in a city that tracks the number of cars look like for a given amount of time e.g. 100 time units?
How to generalize to n-dimensional "edge vectors"?

1) You already did it. That is, your formulation is sufficiently clear and more math you’ll see below.
2) For the convenience we shall use numbers instead of letters ($1$ instead of $A$, $2$ instead of $B$, and so forth) to mark the cities. Let $x(t)=\|x_i(t)\|$ be a car distribution vector, where $x_i(t)$ denotes the quantity of cars in the city $i$ at the discrete moment $t/2=0,1/2,2/2,3/2,\dots$, and $M_p=\|m_{ij,p}\|$ be car redistribution matrices, where $m_{ij,p}$ denotes which parts of cars arrived to a city $i$ are directed to a city $j$ and will reach it in $p/2$ time units. Then the car distribution behavior is determined by the equation
$$x(t)=M_1x(t-1)+ M_2x(t-2),$$
where $x(0)=(10,0,0,0,0)^T$ and for the convenience we also assume that $x(-1)=0$,
$$M_1=\left\|\begin{matrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0.5 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{matrix}\right\|\mbox{, and } M_2=\left\|\begin{matrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0.8 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{matrix}\right\|.$$ In order to deal with a simple linear recurrence, we introduce a variable
$$y(t)=(x_1(t),\dots, x_5(t), x_1(t-1),\dots, x_5(t-1))^T.$$
Then $y(t)=M^{t-1}y(0)$, where $M=\left\|\begin{matrix} M_1 & M_2\\ I & 0\end{matrix}\right\|$ is a block matrix.
3) Here is the graph for $x_i(t)$ (which are marked by $(M\dots)_{i-1}$ for technical reasons).
The scaling suggests that for each $i$ $x_i(t)$ converges to $c\cdot (1,1,1,1,1)^T$, where $c=2.5616\dots$. I’ll try to understand why this happens and calculate $c$.
To calculate $M^{t-1}$ for large $t$ we can pick a non-degenerated matrix $T$ such that $M=P^{-1}\Lambda P$, where $\Lambda $ is Jordan normal form of the matrix $M$. Then $M^{t-1}=P^{-1}\Lambda^{t-1}P$. The calculation of powers of a Jordan matrix $\Lambda$ reduces to the calculation of powers of its Jordan cell, which can be done by a precise formula.
4) There should be no natural generalization, because two-dimensionity of edge vectors is artificial, since length and width are not similar parameters: length corresponds to the car flow time offset and width corresponds to a local car flow distribution.