The rational numbers are exactly those numbers whose decimal
representations either terminate (i.e. all digits are 0 from some point
onwards) or repeat.
How can I prove this statement?
Any help would be appreciated.Thank you!
2026-04-07 16:28:07.1775579287
A proof about rational numbers
253 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in RATIONAL-NUMBERS
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- I don't understand why my college algebra book is picking when to multiply factors
- Non-galois real extensions of $\mathbb Q$
- A variation of the argument to prove that $\{m/n:n \text{ is odd },n,m \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ is a PID
- Almost have a group law: $(x,y)*(a,b) = (xa + yb, xb + ya)$ with rational components.
- When are $\alpha$ and $\cos\alpha$ both rational?
- What is the decimal form of 1/299,792,458
- Proving that the sequence $\{\frac{3n+5}{2n+6}\}$ is Cauchy.
- Is this a valid proof? If $a$ and $b$ are rational, $a^b$ is rational.
- What is the identity element for the subgroup $H=\{a+b\sqrt{2}:a,b\in\mathbb{Q},\text{$a$ and $b$ are not both zero}\}$ of the group $\mathbb{R}^*$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Maybe going through an example will help you with this. We can rewrite real numbers which have a repeating, occurrence of numbers to the right of the decimal as a fraction. For example, the number $0.125125125125...=0.\overline{125}$. Define this number as $x=0.125125125125...$. Thus, $1000x=125.125125125...$ . Furthermore, $1000x-x=999x=125.\overline{125}-0.\overline{125}$. Looking at the far right expression, we know $125.\overline{125}-0.\overline{125}=125+0.\overline{125}-0.\overline{125}=125$. Thus, $999x=125$. Thus, $x=\frac{125}{999}$ which is a fractional representation of a real number. I should also add that just simplifying a terminating sequence of numbers to the right of the decimal should be apparent. For example, $0.36=36/100$. When numbers are to the left of the decimal, we find a common denominator. Hope this helps.
This might be more technical than what you want but here it goes. Take a repeating sequence of numbers we will say $0.\overline{x_1x_2...x_n}$ for some $n\in \mathbb{N}$ where all the xs are numbers in the set $\lbrace 0 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\rbrace$. Define this number as $y=0.\overline{x_1x_2...x_n}$. Thus, $10^ny=x_1x_2...x_n.\overline{x_1x_2...x_n}$. Whence, $(10^n-1)y=x_1x_2...x_n$. Thus, $y=\frac{x_1x_2...x_n}{10^n-1}$. Since $x_1x_2...x_n\in \mathbb{Z}$ and $10^n-1\in \mathbb{Z}^{\neq 0}$, then $y$ must be a rational number. I would then say without loss of generality you could do the same thing where this number is negative.
This proposition is used for the case where there are numbers to the left of the decimal. It should be easy to see that in the case that one of the numbers was negative that the same would occur.
Proposition: The sum of two rational numbers is rational.
Proof: Let $\frac{a}{b}$ be a rational number where $a$ is an integer and $b$ is an integer not equal to zero. Also, let $\frac{c}{d}$ be a rational number where $c$ is an integer and $d$ is an integer not equal to zero. Thus, $\frac{a}{b}+\frac{c}{d}=\frac{ad}{bd}+\frac{bc}{bd}=\frac{ad+cd}{bd}$. Thus, the numerator and denominator for the far right expression are both integers where the denominator does not equal zero. Thus, the theorem has been proven.