Is it true that $E\circ E\subseteq E$ for every entourage $E$ of every uniform space?
2026-02-23 15:24:13.1771860253
A property of uniform spaces
124 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RELATIONS
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Is a relation on which every element is related with itself alone transitive?
- Relation power composition
- Order relation proof
- Order relation proof ...
- How to identify if a given Hasse diagram is a lattice
- Is the relation < a strict total order?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Finding all reflexive binary relations of a set
- Showing that a relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
Related Questions in UNIFORM-SPACES
- Is $\approx$ actually an entourage?
- What is the hausdorff completion of this uniform structure on the real line?
- Completeness of Continuous Functions on Uniform Spaces
- What is the relation between chain connected with connected in uniform space?
- Is there a version of closing lemma in the case of uniform space?
- Closure of $A$ with respect to uniform topology
- The interior of the elements of a uniform structure $D$ is also base for $D$
- Why are compact Hausdorff spaces divisible - and other uniformity related questions
- Question about totally disconnected compact uniform space
- totally disconnected compact Hausdorff uniform space
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As noted in the comments, it clearly is not true in general.
If an entourage $E$ has the property that $E\circ E\subseteq E$, then $E$ is a transitive, reflexive relation on $X$, and the entourage $E\cap E^{-1}$ is an equivalence relation on $X$. A uniform space whose uniformity has a base of equivalence relations is non-Archimedean, the uniform analogue of a non-Archimedean metric space; such a space is zero-dimensional, since it clearly has a base of clopen sets. Conversely, it’s known that every zero-dimensional topology is induced by a non-Archimedean uniformity. (I’ve seen this last result cited to B. Banaschewski, Über nulldimensionale Räume, Math. Nachr. $\bf13$ ($1955$), $129$-$140$, and to A.F. Monna, Remarques sur les métriques non-archimédiennes, Indag. Math. $\bf12$ ($1950$), $122$-$133$; ibid. $\bf12$ ($1950$), $179$-$191$, but I’ve not seen these papers.)