I was reading this answer https://math.stackexchange.com/a/346249/629594 and I am not really sure what $|A|^{<\omega}$ means (I am not so familiar with things that concern ordinals and cardinals). I think that it means the cardianlity of the set $A^k$, where $k$ is a finite cardinal. Am I right? Furthermore, could we write $|A|^{<|\mathbb{N}|}$ instead of $|A|^{<\omega}$?
2026-04-13 00:47:23.1776041243
A question about what does $|A|^{<\omega}$ mean for a set
56 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in CARDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- If $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal then $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \max\{\kappa, 2^{<\kappa}\}$
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- On finding enough rationals (countable) to fill the uncountable number of intervals between the irrationals.
- Is the set of cardinalities totally ordered?
- Show that $n+\aleph_0=\aleph_0$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- What is the cardinality of a set of all points on a line?
- Better way to define this bijection [0,1) to (0,1)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
By $A^{< \omega}$ we mean the set of all finite sequences in $A$. By $|A|$ we mean the cardinality of $A$. Assuming the axiom of choice, which people usually do, this cardinality is represented by an ordinal: the least ordinal that is in bijective correspondence with $A$. So technically $|A|^{< \omega}$ would be the set of all finite sequences in that ordinal, as is mentioned in the comments.
Via the bijection between $A$ and $|A|$ you might as well think of $|A|^{<\omega}$ as the set of all finite sequences in $A$. The point of writing $|A|^{<\omega}$ instead of $A^{<\omega}$ is that we want to stipulate that we ultimately only interested in cardinalities.
This is also true in the context of the question you linked: ultimately they just want $|A|^{<\omega} = |A|$, so they are really only interested in the cardinality of $|A|^{<\omega}$. Perhaps it would be more accurate to write $||A|^{<\omega}|$, but that becomes messy so convention is to not do this. We could also write $|A^{<\omega}|$, but for some reason this does not seem to be standard.
Edit: I left some remaining points in your original question untouched. So it is not quite $A^k$ for some finite $k$, but rather $A^{<\omega} = \bigcup_{k < \omega} A^k$. The second point: yes $|A|^{<\omega} = |A|^{<|\mathbb{N}|}$, this would just be different notation for the same thing (since $|\mathbb{N}| = \omega$), but this notation is again a bit more messy and nonstandard.