Assume $K$is any field of characteristic $0$ which ensues that it makes sense to define in the ring $K[[[X]]$ of formal power series with coefficients in $K$ the formal exponential power series $exp(X)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{n!}\cdot X^{n}$. Of course, rational numbers $\frac{r}{s}\ (r\in \mathbb{Z},s\in \mathbb{N})$ regarded as elements of$K$ have to be interpreted as $\frac{r\cdot 1}{s\cdot 1}$, where $1$is the neutral element of multiplication in $K$-. Let the operator $\left[ X^{k} \right]$ extract the k-th coefficient from a formal power series: $\left[ X^{k} \right](\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }c_{n}\cdot X^{n})=c_{k}$- Now it is easy to see that for every power series $q$ with $[X^{0}] (q)=0$ the composition $exp(q(X))$ is well-defined - not involving any convergence considerations - because for each fixed $k_{0}\in \mathbb{N}$ only finitely many powers $q(X)^{k}$ contribute a non-zero term to the coefficient $[X^{k_{0}}] (exp(q(X)))$. And it is clear that always $[X^{0}] (exp(q(X)))=1$ then. My question now is: What about the opposite direction? Can you show that for every $p\in K[[[X]]$ with $[X^{0}] (p(X))=1$ there is a $q\in K[[[X]]$ with $[X^{0}] (q(X))=0$ satisfying $exp(q(X))=p(X)$ ?
2026-03-26 23:11:02.1774566662
About the formal exponential power series over an arbitrary field of characteristic 0
78 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in FORMAL-POWER-SERIES
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- Finding the period of decimal
- Jacobson radical of formal power series over an integral domain
- Proof of existence of an inverse formal power series
- Proof of homomorphism property of the exponential function for formal power series
- formal power series ring over field is m-adic complete
- Let $F[[X]]$ be the ring of formal power series over the field $F$. Show that $(X)$ is a maximal ideal.
- Power Series Arithmetic through Formal Power Series
- Diagonal power series is holonomic
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can do this using the formal power series for $\log(1+x)$ which is $$L(x)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty(-1)^{n+1}x^n/n.$$ To make sense of this, note that more generally a composition of formal power series $p(q(x))$ is well-defined as long as $q$ has no constant term, and this composition is associative. In particular, the compositions $L(\exp(x)-1)$ and $\exp(L(x))-1$ both make sense, and both can be shown to be equal to just $x$. (You can either verify this by some explicit calculations with coefficients, or you can observe that the composition of formal power series will converge for $x$ near $0$ in $\mathbb{C}$ to the composition of the exponential and logarithm functions on $\mathbb{C}$; since the composition of those analytic functions is the identity function it follows that the composed formal power series must be the identity as well.)
So, given $p(x)\in K[[x]]$ with constant term $1$, the power series $$q(x)=L(p(x)-1)$$ will satisfy $$\exp(q(x))=\exp(L(p(x)-1))=(p(x)-1)+1=p(x)$$ by associativity of composition of power series.