Let $T$ be a linear operator on a vector space $V$. A subspace $W$ is called $T$-admissible if
- $W$ is $T$-invariant
- if $f(T)\beta$ lies in $W$, then there exists a vector $w$ in W, such that $f(T) \beta = f(T) w$ ($f$ is a polynomial)
This definition is taken from Hoffman-Kunze. My question is whether the second condition sufficient for implying invariance? I doubt it, but haven't been able to find a counter. Could someone help with that.
Note : For infinite dimensional spaces, this is not sufficient. Take the integral operator on the set of polynomials and take the subspace to be that of constant multiples.
What would happen in finite dimensional space?
Assume the field $F$ of scalars is infinite, such as $\mathbb C$ or $\mathbb R$.
Suppose $V$ is finite-dimensional over $F$ with dimension $n$.
Since $F$ is infinite, there is a $\lambda\in F$ such that $T-\lambda I_n$ is invertible.
Then $(T-\lambda I_n)V= V$. Hence $((T-\lambda I_n)V) \cap W= W$. The condition of admissibility implies that $((T-\lambda I_n)V)\cap W= ((T-\lambda I_n)W )\cap W$. Hence, $$(T-\lambda I_n)W\supseteq W.$$ Since both sides have the same finite dimension, they must be equal. $$(T-\lambda I_n)W= W.$$ which implies $TW\subseteq W$.
Please check Kr Dpk's answer for a simple counterexample when $F$ is finite.