Assume $\beta$ can be expressed in terms of polynomial relation in $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]$. Where $\alpha$ is an algebraic integer (i.e. $\alpha$ is the root of a polynomial in $\mathbb{Z}[X]$.
How can I argue that $\beta$ is itself an algebraic integer?
Attempt:
- assume: $r_0 + r_1 \beta+ r_2 \beta^2 + \ldots + r_t \beta^t=0$ with $r_i \in \mathbb{Z}[\alpha]$
- assume wlog, that $r_1$ contains some exponent $\alpha^l$
- how can I substitue that exponent, since I only have the condition $q_0 + q_1 \alpha + q_2 \alpha^2 + \ldots + q_r \alpha^r=0$.
The standard argument for this requires a bit of machinery, namely the following theorem (the formulation below is from Atiyah-MacDonald, Proposition 5.1).
Theorem. Let $B$ be a (commutative) ring and $A$ a subring and $x \in B$. Then the following four statements are equivalent.
Then, as a corollary (Corollary 5.4. in Atiyah-MacDonald), you get the following.
Corrolary. Let $A \subseteq B \subseteq C$ be (commutative) rings. Assume that $B$ is integral over $A$ and that $C$ is integral over $B$. Then $C$ is integral over $A$.
Proof Take $x \in C$. Because $C$ is integral over $B$, $$x^n + b_{n-1} x^{n-1} + \dots + b_0 = 0$$ for certain $b_0, \dots, b_{n-1} \in B$. The ring $B' = A[b_1,\dots,b_n]$ is a finitely generated $A$-module (repeatedly the theorem above) and $B'[x]$ is a finitely generated $B'$-module (also by the theorem above). Hence $B'[x]$ is a finitely generated $A$-module and therefore (again by the theorem above) $x$ is integral over $A$.