When representing vectors as directed lines with initial and terminal point:
Coinitial vectors- Two or more vectors that have same initial points are called coinitial vectors.
But aren't all vectors coinitial? Because vectors can be shifted (without changing orientation), so any vectors can be shifted to make their initial point same.
Isn't "coinitial vectors" a redundant unnecessary term?
Note: Coinitial vectors makes sense when vectors are represented in x-y or x-y-z vector plane/space. :Note
So is the definition of coinitial vectors this? -
Two or more vectors whose initial points are same in vector plane are called coinitial vectors.
But when not talking about vector plane (for example when illustrating vector addition, etc), aren't all vectors coinitial.
And what is right definition of coinitial vectors?
[Kindly edit the question if needed as I am new to maths, terms, definitions etc]
The vector field of airflow in a room is a collection of non-coinitial vectors. They cannot be coinitial because there is only one flow direction at any point in the room (excepting points where the flow is zero, since the direction is undefined at those points).
If you rigidly rotate a circle along itself, the displacement vectors are not coinitial because each point has only one destination, not more than one.
The velocity vectors of points on a sphere are not coinitial because all such vectors are parallel to the surface at their initial points. Different initial points give different tangent planes, so the initial point is crucial to determine the space of possible velocity vectors at a point on the sphere.