why the Lorentz transformations forbid passing to a reference system with the speed equal to that of light despite there are particles (photons) traveling at this speed? in other words I see the fact that the Lorentz transformations forbid placing oneself in an inertial system that travels at the speed of light (due to the cancellation of the denominator $1-\beta^2$) and that there is a photon that travels at this speed, which is a contradiction. Generally the explanation is that an observer cannot have zero mass. Despite this I see the possibility of having a luminary system coinciding with the existence of a particle traveling at the speed of light, hence the contradiction that I said above. Can anyone explain to me the right point of view that I need to adopt?
2026-02-23 11:35:55.1771846555
an apparent "inconsistency" in lorentz transformations?
23 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtRelated Questions in SPECIAL-RELATIVITY
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Rocket to a ray of light
- The reason of script expression of $\lambda^\mu_{\;\;\nu}$
- Understanding the tensor notation in special/general theory of relativity
- I am currently reading Special Relativity by Woodhouse, I need help with understanding divergence of magnetic fields
- Didn't understand a step in Einstein's paper on special relativity
- Special Relativity: A showing question $c^2-v^2$ using Velocity transformations
- Form of Lorentz Transformation in 3D space
- reference for special relativity
- Valid Interpretation of Special Relativity in terms of Length Contraction of Relative Distances
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?