For the second proof, it says "$\{x\in X: f_1(x) > \alpha\} = \{x \in X : f(x) >\alpha \} \cup B$". $f_1(x)$ cannot be equal to $-\infty$. Then, why is it union of $B$?
2026-03-31 22:43:49.1774997029
On
An extended real value function is measurable (proof verification)
410 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
3
There are 3 best solutions below
0
On
If $\alpha < 0$ and $f_1(x) > \alpha$, then either $f(x)$ is finite and $f(x) = f_1(x) > \alpha$ or $f(x) = \infty$ or $f(x) = -\infty$. Thus, $$\{x: f_1(x) > \alpha\} \subset \{x: f(x) > \alpha\} \cup A \cup B.$$ But $A \subset \{x: f(x) > \alpha\}$, so this reduces to $$\{x: f_1(x) > \alpha\} \subset \{x: f(x) > \alpha\} \cup B.$$ Conversely, if $\alpha<0$ and either $f(x)> \alpha$ or $f(x) = -\infty$, then, in the former case $f(x)$ is either finite or = $\infty$, whence $f_1(x) = f(x)$ or $0$, respectively, whence $f_1(x)> \alpha$; and in the latter case $f_1(x)=0 > \alpha$. So, $$\{x: f_1(x) > \alpha\} \supset \{x: f(x) > \alpha\} \cup B.$$

For e.g. $\alpha=-1$ we find that the following statements are equivalent: