Say we have a surface $\Sigma$ that is compact, orientable, and has boundary, with $\chi (\Sigma)<0.$ Say $\gamma$ is an essential simple closed curve in $\Sigma$. I'm trying to understand what the annular cover of $\Sigma$ with respect to $\gamma$ looks like. Obviously it is topologically an annulus, and I believe the core curve should be a lift of $\gamma$, but I don't totally see what the covering space map should look like.
2026-03-26 14:20:29.1774534829
Annular cover of a surface?
210 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SURFACES
- Surface by revolution
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- 2D closed surface such that there's always a straight line to a point?
- parametrized surface are isometric if all corresponding curves have same length
- Klein bottle and torus in mod $p$ homology
- How can I prove that the restricted parametrization of a surface in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ ia a diffeomorphism?
- A diffeomorphism between a cylinder and a one-sheeted hyperboloid
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-TOPOLOGY
- Finite covers of handlebodies?
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- Constructing a fat Cantor Set with certain property
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Labeled graphs with unimodular adjacency matrix
- Pseudoisotopy between nonisotopic maps
- A topological question about loops and fixed points
- "Continuity" of volume function on hyperbolic tetrahedra
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- What is the pushout of $D^n \longleftarrow S^{n-1} \longrightarrow D^n$?
Related Questions in COVERING-SPACES
- Definition of regular covering maps: independent of choice of point
- Universal cover $\mathbb{S}^3 \rightarrow SO(3)$ through Quaternions.
- How to find a minimal planar covering of a graph
- Questions from Forster's proof regarding unbranched holomorphic proper covering map
- $\mathbb{S}^2$ and $\mathbb{RP}^2$ are the only compact surfaces with finite number of covers.
- Is the monodromy action of the universal covering of a Riemann surface faithful?
- Left half of complex plane and graph of logarithm are diffeomorphic?
- regular covering proof
- The map $p : S^1 → S^1$ given by $p(z) = z^2$ is a covering map. Generalize to $p(z) = z^n$.
- If $H \le \pi_1(X,x)$ is conjugate to $P_*(\pi_1(Y, y))$, then $H \cong P_*(\pi_1(Y, y'))$ for some $y' \in P^{-1}(x)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It's somewhat unclear to me what your question is other than "How do I see the covering space?", and I don't know how to "see" the covering space other than to apply the classification theorem for covering spaces.
The covering map $$f: \widetilde\Sigma \to \Sigma $$ which comes from application of that theorem has the property that the induced homomorphism $f_* : \pi_1(\widetilde\Sigma) \to \pi_1 \Sigma$ is injective and its image is equal to the infinite cyclic subgroup $Z_\gamma$ which is the image of the inclusion induced homomorphism $\pi_1\gamma \hookrightarrow \pi_1\Sigma$ (which is an injective homomorphism). I am abusing notation here by suppressing base points.
One can prove that an annulus neighborhood $A \subset \Sigma$ of $\gamma$ does indeed lift homeomorphically to an annulus $\widetilde A \subset \widetilde\Sigma$, and that the whole of $\widetilde\Sigma$ deformation retracts to $\widetilde A$, although $\widetilde\Sigma$ will generally be strictly larger than $\widetilde A$. And one can prove that $\widetilde\Sigma$ is itself a manifold with boundary whose interior is an open annulus.
But again, as for how to "see" $\widetilde\Sigma$, you would have to be more explicit about what you are "looking" for. Perhaps some details are contained in the proof of the classification theorem, namely the portion which constructs the covering $f : \widetilde\Sigma \to \Sigma$. Alternatively, one can simply try to deduce properties from the knowledge that $\pi_1(\widetilde\Sigma)$ is infinite cyclic.
Added: It occurred to me that one can say more about $\widetilde\Sigma$ with regard to its boundary, leading to a complete description of the topological type of $\widetilde\Sigma$, although I remain unsure whether this counts as "seeing" $\widetilde\Sigma$ in a sense that you desire.
Since you started with $\Sigma$ being a compact surface with nonempty boundary, it follows that $\widetilde\Sigma$ also has nonempty boundary. But since $\Sigma$ is not itself an annulus, and since $\gamma$ is an essential simple closed curve in $\Sigma$, it follows that each connected lift in $\widetilde\Sigma$ of each component of $\partial \Sigma$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb R$. Thus, $\partial\widetilde\Sigma$ is a union of copies of $\mathbb R$. From this, together with the fact that $\widetilde\Sigma$ has infinite cyclic fundamental group, we can deduce that $\widetilde\Sigma$ is homeomorphic to a noncompact surface obtained from a compact annulus by removing a nonempty, nowhere dense, closed subset of each component of $\partial\widetilde\Sigma$ (there's some work buried here). Furthermore, the set removed cannot contain any isolated points (here's some more work).
Therefore $\widetilde\Sigma$ is obtained from a compact annulus by removing a Cantor subset of each component of the boundary of that annulus.