I'm having issues wrapping my head around anti-symmetric examples in specific contexts. I understand that if BOTH $a$, $b$ belong to $\mathbb{R}$ then $a = b$ and if $a \ne b$ then they aren't anti-symmetric.
The context I'm having issues with is inheritance i.e family tree.
$$A = \left\{(x,y) \in P^2 \,\big\vert\, x \text{ is an ancestor of }y \right\}$$
I proved that the relation is NOT symmetric as x can be an ancestor of y but y can't be an ancestor of x. So if it's not symmetric because of the logic reason I gave before it shouldn't be antisymmetric, right?
$$\textit{Anti-symmetry means that mutually related things are identical.}$$
A simple example is the “at most” relation ($\leq$); here, anti-symmetry means $$\text{ if } x \leq y \text { and } y \leq x \text{ then } x = y$$
For the ‘ancestor’ relation, the statements $x \, A \, y$ and $y \, A \, x$ mean that “$x$ is an ancestor of $y$ and $y$ is an ancestor of $x$”, which necessarily means that $x$ and $y$ are the same person.
On the other hand, $$\textit{Symmetry means that the relation is always mutual.}$$
A simple example is ‘equality’; indeed if $x = y$ then necessarily $y=x$.
Indeed the ancestor relation is not symmetric, as you've reasoned.
Hope that helps!