Is $Hom_\mathbb{R}(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ (linear transformations) = $Hom(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ (morphisms of abelian groups)? No hypothesis of continuity is assumed.
Obviously $Hom_\mathbb{R}(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}) \subseteq Hom(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$.
Because $(\mathbb{R},+)$ is a divisible group a map $f \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ is a group homomorphism if and only if it is $\mathbb{Q}$-linear. So your question is if any $\mathbb{Q}$-linear map $\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ is already $\mathbb{R}$ linear, i.e. given by multiplication with a real scalar.
To see that this doesn’t hold let $(x_i)_{i \in I}$ is a $\mathbb{Q}$-basis of $\mathbb{R}$. Then then any permutation of two basis $x_i$ and $x_j$ with $i \neq j$ induces a $\mathbb{Q}$-linear map $f_{ij} \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ which is not given by multiplication with a real scalar, as $f_{ij}$ fixes $x_k$ for $k \notin \{i,j\}$. (Notice that we used the axiom of choice to construct these counterexamples.)