I am reading Lectures on Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, and I come across the statement on page 50 that says "All matrix groups are Lie groups". Does it mean all subgroups of general linear groups? If it does, how do I prove it?
2026-05-17 11:06:35.1779015995
Are all matrix groups Lie groups?
248 Views Asked by user87543 https://math.techqa.club/user/user87543/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The authors clearly goofed. There are even examples of matrix groups which are not isomorphic to Lie groups as abstract groups. (In the theory of topological groups one usually uses homeomorphic isomorphisms. When I say that an isomorphism of topological groups is abstract, I mean that it is a purely group-theoretic isomorphism, which is not required to be continuous.)
For instance, the additive group $\widehat{{\mathbb Z}}_p$ of p-adic integers is isomorphic to a subgroup $G$ of the additive group of real numbers ${\mathbb R}$. This isomorphism can be seen as follows. The algebraic closure $\overline{{\mathbb Q}_p}$ of the field of $p$-adic numbers is isomorphic (as a field) to ${\mathbb C}$. This gives an embedding (as an abstract group) of $\widehat{{\mathbb Z}}_p$ in the additive group of complex numbers. The latter is isomorphic (as an abstract group) to the additive group of real numbers.
One can show that the additive group $\widehat{{\mathbb Z}}_p$ is not isomorphic (as an abstract group) to any Lie group. (My definition of a Lie group includes the 2nd countable assumption.) The key is that $\widehat{{\mathbb Z}}_p$ is a profinite group, which implies that every nontrivial subgroup of $\widehat{{\mathbb Z}}_p$ has an epimorphism to a nontrivial finite (cyclic) group. At the same time, if $H$ is a connected abelian Lie group, $H$ does not admit (even discontinuous) epimorphisms to finite nontrivial groups. Since $\widehat{{\mathbb Z}}_p$ is uncountable, no subgroup of countable index in it is isomorphic to a Lie group. However, every Lie group contains a connected Lie subgroup of countable index. Thus, $\widehat{{\mathbb Z}}_p$ is not isomorphic to any Lie group (as an abstract group).