I'm new in MSE and in functional analysis. Really need explanation with this topic and exercise: Is the set {${m^2}/{n^2}: m,n\in \mathbb{N}$} everywhere dense in positive rational numbers set? And is the set {${m^m}/{n^n}: m,n\in \mathbb{N}$} everywhere dense in positive rational numbers set? I thought to use here a dense set definition but maybe it isn't enough.
2026-03-25 20:08:31.1774469311
Are sets everywhere dense in rational numbers set?
88 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in RATIONAL-NUMBERS
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- I don't understand why my college algebra book is picking when to multiply factors
- Non-galois real extensions of $\mathbb Q$
- A variation of the argument to prove that $\{m/n:n \text{ is odd },n,m \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ is a PID
- Almost have a group law: $(x,y)*(a,b) = (xa + yb, xb + ya)$ with rational components.
- When are $\alpha$ and $\cos\alpha$ both rational?
- What is the decimal form of 1/299,792,458
- Proving that the sequence $\{\frac{3n+5}{2n+6}\}$ is Cauchy.
- Is this a valid proof? If $a$ and $b$ are rational, $a^b$ is rational.
- What is the identity element for the subgroup $H=\{a+b\sqrt{2}:a,b\in\mathbb{Q},\text{$a$ and $b$ are not both zero}\}$ of the group $\mathbb{R}^*$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm going to assume you mean the positive rationals, since otherwise the answer is trivially "no" (do you see why?).
Here are two hints:
Note that the first set is just the set of positive rational squares $\{q^2: q\in\mathbb{Q}\}$ (why?). Now suppose I have a $p\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}$, and I want to find a positive rational square "really close" to $p$.
Although $\sqrt{p}$ probably isn't rational (e.g. take $p=2$), there are positive rationals really really close to $\sqrt{p}$ (why?).
Intuitively, if $q$ is a positive rational really really close to $\sqrt{p}$, then $q^2$ should be really close to $p$. Do you see how to make this precise, and why this implies that the set of positive rational squares is dense in $\mathbb{Q}_{>0}$?
Before we move on to the next part, here's a follow-up exercise: what about the set of positive rational cubes? Is it dense in $\mathbb{Q}_{>0}$?
The above trick doesn't seem to work - at least, not immediately - for the second set, so it's time to play around a bit! Testing some possible choices of $m$ and $n$ (actually do this) should convince you that numbers of the form ${m^m\over n^n}$ are either "really big" or "really small." That kind of sparseness suggests that the set isn't dense. To start working your way towards a proof, suppose I have natural numbers $m<n$. What's the biggest possible value for ${m^m\over n^n}$? It's certainly at most $1$, but can you find a better bound?
Before tackling this immediately, try some examples - $m=1,n=2$, and $m=1,n=3$, and $m=2,n=3$, and maybe a couple more until you can make a guess.
Once you've proved that your guess is correct: what does this bound tell you about the density/non-density of the set $\{{m^m\over n^n}:m,n\in\mathbb{N}\}$? HINT: think about what happens between this bound and $1$ ...