I am interested to know if lie algebras of $su(n)$, $so(n)$ and $sp(n)$ have the same branching rules as groups $SU(n)$, $SO(n)$ and $Sp(n)$. I am studying Finite-Dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Representations for Unified Model Building, by Naoki Yamatsu, and I want to know if I can have the same rules for the groups mentioned above.
2026-03-29 11:20:23.1774783223
Are the branching rules the same for a lie algebra and it's corresponding lie group?
182 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in BRANCHING-RULES
- Branching Process and point of ceasing
- Decomposition of $SO(10)$ into $SU(4)$
- Branching of $SU\left(5\right)$ under $SU\left(2\right)\times SU\left(3\right)$
- Simplifying exponents: $a^x > a^y$
- Offspring generating function in Branching process.
- Explanation of branching process theory.
- BGW branching process extinction probability
- Suppose a parent has no offspring with $p=\frac{1}{4}$ and two offspring with $p=\frac{3}{4}$. Obtain a recursion equation for $u_n$.
- Algorithmic/procedural way to find branch points and branch cuts?
- 15 puzzle problem using Branch and Bound
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I love this article, but it uses a some-what sloppy convention that is very common in the physics literature: whenever they talk about a group they actually mean the corresponding Lie algebra.
So that answers your question in somewhat vacuous way.
More general (but only in the finite dimensional case!): the representations of the Lie algebra are all the ones that exist. Now two groups (e.g. $SO(3)$ and $SU(2)$) can have the same Lie algebra but not the same representations. Concretely in the example: all irreps of $su(n)$ are irreps of $SU(n)$ but only the odd-dimensional ones are also reps of $SO(3)$. In all cases however the group reps are a subset of the Lie algebra reps: given a lie algebra rep you have to check if it 'lifts' to the group, the other direction (from group rep to Lie algebra rep) always goes through.
The situation for branching between groups is similar: we get the branching rule on the Lie algebra level and then in concrete cases we have to see if they lift to the group level. However: if we know that a given lie algebra rep is a group rep for the big group then it is also a rep for the subgroup simply by restricting the action to the subgroup.
Thus we get a Lie algebra rep for the lie algebra of the subgroup of which the branching rule dictates how it decomposes as a sum of irreps and then it follows from the fact that we got this non-irreducible rep for the (small) Lie algebra by differentiating an actually existing group representation (of the small group) that each of the irreducible reps into which it decomposes also come from actually existing group representations, i.e. lift to the small group.