If we assume there is no limit to the amount of mathematics we create/discover, is it possible that there are infinitely many proofs about any true mathematical statement? For example, we have Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, but due to the deeply interconnected nature of mathematics surely there are many other proofs of it out there waiting to be discovered. Another example is the plethora of proofs regarding the Pythagorean Theorem which seems to be understood better the more we generalize it. In other words, is mathematics an infinitely large web that is connected at infinitely many points? (this is probably an inadequate analogy for capturing mathematics but it's the only one I could think of)
2026-03-30 17:08:14.1774890494
Are there infinitely many proofs of every true mathematical statement?
155 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOUNDATIONS
- Difference between provability and truth of Goodstein's theorem
- Can all unprovable statements in a given mathematical theory be determined with the addition of a finite number of new axioms?
- Map = Tuple? Advantages and disadvantages
- Why doesn't the independence of the continuum hypothesis immediately imply that ZFC is unsatisfactory?
- Formally what is an unlabeled graph? I have no problem defining labeled graphs with set theory, but can't do the same here.
- Defining first order logic quantifiers without sets
- How to generalize the mechanism of subtraction, from naturals to negatives?
- Mathematical ideas that took long to define rigorously
- What elementary theorems depend on the Axiom of Infinity?
- Proving in Quine's New Foundations
Related Questions in PHILOSOPHY
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- Should axioms be seen as "building blocks of definitions"?
- Difference between provability and truth of Goodstein's theorem
- Decidability and "truth value"
- Is it possible to construct a formal system such that all interesting statements from ZFC can be proven within the system?
- Why linear congruential generator is called random number generator?
- Why is negative minus negative not negative? Why is negative times positive not directionless?
- What's the difference between a proof and a derivation?
- Godel's Theorems and Conventionalism
- Is "This sentence is true" true or false (or both); is it a proposition?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose I have a proof of $\varphi\implies\psi$. I will now construct infinitely many proofs of $\phi\implies\psi$, where $\varphi$ and $\psi$ are propositions. The first one goes like this:
Suppose $\varphi$
Thus, $\varphi\land\varphi$.
Thus, $\varphi$.
Thus, $\psi$.
Here's the second one.
Suppose $\varphi$.
Thus, $\varphi\land\varphi\land\varphi$.
Thus, $\varphi$.
Thus, $\psi$.
I can do this as many times as I like, and get a different proof of $\psi$ that way.
In case you're unfamiliar, $"\land"$ means "and."
The thing is that none of these proosf are functionally different. It's just a cheap way of creating a "technically" different proof. If this is what you mean by "are there infinitely many proofs of any statement?" then yes.
What you might mean, though, is whether there are infinitely many proofs that "use different ideas" or use some different kind of insight. This isn't really a precise definition, but it's all I've got to work with. The question isn't really answerable until you define what you mean by "different proofs."