let R be a commutative ring, and M, N two bimodules over R, such that there exists f : M -> N an isomorphism of left R-modules, and g : M -> N an isomorphism of right R-modules. Then are M and N isomorphic as R-bimodules? I don't see any reason why it should be true, but I can't find any situation where this is false. Thanks a lot!
2026-04-07 19:31:18.1775590278
Are two bimodules isomomorphic as left and right modules also isomorphic as bimodules?
438 Views Asked by FrenchStudent https://math.techqa.club/user/frenchstudent/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As you say, there is no reason why this should be true. Consider on the one hand $R$ regarded as an $(R, R)$-bimodule in the usual way and on the other hand $R$ regarded as an $(R, R)$-bimodule where, say, the left $R$-module has been twisted by an automorphism $\varphi : R \to R$, which is to say that left multiplication now looks like
$$L_r s = \varphi(r) s.$$
Both of these bimodules are isomorphic as left modules to $R$ and as right modules to $R$, but they usually won't be isomorphic as bimodules if $\varphi$ is nontrivial. We can try to distinguish them by their centers. Recall that the center of a bimodule $_R M_R$ is
$$Z(M) = \{ m \in M : rm = mr \forall r \in R \}.$$
Then the center of the usual $R$ is the usual center $Z(R)$, but the center of the twisted $R$ is
$$\{ s \in R : \varphi(r) s = s r \forall r \in R \}$$
and this will just be different in general (as a subgroup of $R$). For example, if $R$ is commutative, then $Z(R)$ is all of $R$, but the above cannot be all of $R$ if $\varphi$ is nontrivial since, for example, it cannot include the identity.