I just had a small question about assumptions in mathematical word problems. Suppose you are given a calculus problem (related-rates),
"A spherical balloon is inflated with gas at the rate of 800 cubic centimeters per minute. How fast is the radius of the balloon increasing at the instant the radius is (a) 30 centimeters and (b) 60 centimeters?" (Larson Calculus P 153)
This is a quoted problem from Larson's Calculus 10th Edition.
My question is here:
Why do you assume for example that there is no hole from, which air LEAVES? Basically, in general, why do you make unstated assumptions for example, there is no air leaving, or the balloon doesnt explode before the radius is (a) 30 cm etc..?
Here is what others say,
Others say it is so you could solve the problem, what do you think?
A man walks into a restaurant, orders food, eats, then leaves.
Did the man have to cook his food? Did he pay? Did he sit down? Did he eat the food he ordered or just eat something else entirely.
Your problem is known in Psychology as the interpretation and application of one's schema. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema_(psychology)
Because people are different, they often "fill in the gaps" using different schema than the problem designer had intended. I have experience with this as I used to teach.
If you are ever in doubt. Ask the instructor, or try to imagine the simplest solution possible (no leak or explosions or any other outside problem).