Why does Schwarz get credit for proving “Cauchy–Schwarz for integrals”? There is an easy proof of Cauchy–Schwarz that relies only on $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ being an inner product, whether defined in terms of integrals or not. And proving that $$(f,g) \mapsto \int_X f(x)\overline{g(x)}\,d\mu(x)$$ is an inner product is not hard either. Why bother looking at Schwarz’s proof, either now or back in the time when it was published?
2026-04-07 17:47:19.1775584039
Attribution for the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality
175 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in MATH-HISTORY
- Are there negative prime numbers?
- University math curriculum focused on (or inclusive of) "great historical works" of math?
- Did Grothendieck acknowledge his collaborators' intellectual contributions?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
- What about the 'geometry' in 'geometric progression'?
- Discovery of the first Janko Group
- Has miscommunication ever benefited mathematics? Let's list examples.
- Neumann Theorem about finite unions of cosets
- What is Euler doing?
- A book that shows history of mathematics and how ideas were formed?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
An inner product was not defined until ~1905 by Hilbert. Orthogonality of the trigonometric functions in the Fourier expansion was experimentally discovered in the late 1700's, and Fourier built on this work with more general orthogonal function expansions. Cauchy only came up with his inequality for complex Euclidean space in the 1820's (I think that's right.) And no connection was made between orthogonality of functions with respect to an integral and the Euclidean dot product until the second half of the 1800's. Part of the reason for this disconnect may have been that there was no natural path from the sum to the integral because the Riemann integral was not defined until several decades later.
A note by Bunyakowsky appeared in a journal in 1859 that the discrete case could be generalized to integrals, but it was ignored because no applications were given. It wasn't until the next decade that Schwarz published a paper on minimal surfaces where the Schwarz inequality for the integral was rediscovered and used to measure something like a distance in order to get at a solution for PDEs. But, even then, it was not noticed that there was a general concept of a "norm" or "distance function." Cantor began developing set axioms for the foundation of Mathematics about that time, and by the turn of the 20th century, people started thinking of abstract "spaces" where a point could be an object such as a function. And that's what led to Hilbert's definition of a general inner product space, and to a great deal of modern Mathematics. The current version of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality was proved in this context.
So, the Schwarz inequality for integrals came a few decades before the definition of an inner product. And Cauchy's inequality for the discrete case came about 80 years earlier. I believe it was Hilbert who tagged the general inner product inequality as Cauchy-Schwarz because of the work of these two Mathematicians.