I'd like to learn more about the automorphism group of direct products of cyclic groups where at least one factor is $\mathbb Z$. There seem to be many articles studying analogous questions for finite groups, but i am unable to find anything for products infinite groups, not even for cyclic ones. Does anyone know any references that study this or something more general?
2026-04-02 06:19:47.1775110787
Automorphism groups of direct products of non-finite cyclic groups
107 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in AUTOMORPHISM-GROUP
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- A weird automorphism
- Confusing step in proof of property of cyclic group automorphisms
- ord$(a) = p, f(a) = a, \forall f : G \to G$ automorphism $\implies |G|$ is not square-free
- Arbitrary automorphism function on Aut(Quaternion Group)?
- writing a computer program in magma that finds a linear code and a specific automorphism group to the code.
- Let $G$ be a group. Show that, for every $a\in G$, the map $\phi_a:G\to G$, defined by $\phi_a(g) := aga^{−1}$ ($g\in G$), is a group automorphism.
- homomorphism from $F^\times \times F^\times$ to Aut$(F)$
- Extension of isomorphism of fields
- Graph with distinct automorphisms but no fixed-point free automorphism
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The analysis is the same, whether the groups are finite or infinite.
Suppose $G$ and $H$ are two abelian groups. A morphism $\varphi\colon G\times H\to G\times H$ corresponds to four morphisms, $$\begin{align*} \varphi_{G,G}\colon &\ G\to G\\ \varphi_{G,H}\colon &\ G\to H\\ \varphi_{H,G}\colon &\ H\to G\\ \varphi_{H,H}\colon &\ H\to H \end{align*}$$ by the rule that $$\varphi(g,h) = \Bigl( \varphi_{G,G}(h)\varphi_{H,G}(h), \varphi_{G,H}(g)\varphi_{H,H}(h)\Bigr);$$ namely, $\varphi_{G,G}$ is the restriction of $\pi_G\circ\varphi$ to $G$; $\varphi_{G,H}$ is the restriction of $\pi_G\circ\varphi$ to $G$, etc.
We can view this as a $2\times 2$ matrix acting on a column vector, $$\left(\begin{array}{cc} \varphi_{G,G} & \varphi_{H,G}\\ \varphi_{G,H} & \varphi_{G,G}\end{array} \right)\left(\begin{array}{c}g\\h\end{array}\right) = \varphi\left(\begin{array}{c}g\\h\end{array}\right).$$
It is now straightforward to verify that if $\varphi$ and $\theta$ are morphisms, then the matrix corresponding to $\varphi\circ\theta$ is precisely the "product" of the matrices corresponding to $\varphi$ and to $\theta$. So that the endomorphisms of $G\times H$ correspond to $$\left(\begin{array}{cc} \mathrm{Hom}(G,G) & \mathrm{Hom}(H,G)\\ \mathrm{Hom}(G,H) & \mathrm{Hom}(H,H) \end{array}\right).$$ When one of the factors is torsion (say $H$) and the other is torsionfree (say $G$), then one of the off-diagonal entries is necessarily trivial (in this case, $\mathrm{Hom}(H,G)$). And then it is straightforward to check that the endomorphism is an automorphism if and only if the diagonal entries are automorphisms.
For example, $\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}\times C_2)$ will then correspond to matrices of the form $$\left(\begin{array}{cc} \psi & 0\\ \theta & 1\end{array}\right),$$ where $\psi$ is an automorphism of $\mathbb{Z}$ (either the identity, or the map that sends $a$ to $-a$), $1$ is the identity map of $C_2$ (its only automorphism), and $\theta\colon\mathbb{Z}\to C_2$ is a morphism; either the map that sends everything to $0$, or else the map that sends $1\in\mathbb{Z}$ to the generator of $C_2$. So you have a total of four automorphisms.
The automorphisms of $\mathbb{Z}\times C_4$, on the other hand, correspond to matrices of the form $$\left(\begin{array}{cc} \psi & 0\\ \theta & \phi \end{array}\right)$$ where $\psi$ is an automorphism of $\mathbb{Z}$ (either the identity or multiply-by-minus-one); $\phi$ is an automorphism of $C_4$ (either the identity, or the map sending each element to its inverse), and $\theta\colon\mathbb{Z}\to C_4$ is any of the four possible morphisms, sending $1$ to your favorite element of $C_4$. So here we have $2\times 2\times 4 = 16$ possible automorphisms.
For three or more factors, provided there are only finitely many factors, the answer is similar: the endomorphisms of $A_1\times\cdots\times A_n$ correspond to $n^2$ morphisms, $\varphi_{i,j}\colon A_i\to A_j$, and you can "arrange" them in a matrix form so that composition of endomorphisms corresponds to multiplication of matrices, and the automorphisms are precisely the invertible matrices. Having some groups be torsion and some torsionfree means that some of the entries must be equal to $0$ (the ones corresponding to morphisms from the torsion groups to the torsionfree groups).