What does it mean to say that the axioms of arithmetic (Peano's or Dedekind's) are sufficient to characterize the abstract, mathematical structure of the natural numbers up to isomorphism?
2026-04-01 01:05:10.1775005510
Axioms of arithmetic and isomorphism
589 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in FOUNDATIONS
- Difference between provability and truth of Goodstein's theorem
- Can all unprovable statements in a given mathematical theory be determined with the addition of a finite number of new axioms?
- Map = Tuple? Advantages and disadvantages
- Why doesn't the independence of the continuum hypothesis immediately imply that ZFC is unsatisfactory?
- Formally what is an unlabeled graph? I have no problem defining labeled graphs with set theory, but can't do the same here.
- Defining first order logic quantifiers without sets
- How to generalize the mechanism of subtraction, from naturals to negatives?
- Mathematical ideas that took long to define rigorously
- What elementary theorems depend on the Axiom of Infinity?
- Proving in Quine's New Foundations
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
When we say that the axioms are sufficient to describe a structure up to isomorphism we mean that any two structures in which the axioms hold are isomorphic.
To be more explicit, let $\cal L$ be a language, and $T$ a theory in some1 logic. Then $T$ has a unique model up to isomorphism if whenever $M$ and $N$ are two $\cal L$ structures such that $M\models T$ and $N\models T$, then $M\cong N$.
For example, if we consider the axioms of an ordered field (the usual axioms of a field, plus the axioms of a linear order, plus the axioms stating that the operations behave nicely with the order) and the second-order logic axiom stating "Every bounded set has a least upper bound", then every model of the theory is isomorphic to $\mathbb R$ (and the isomorphism is unique in this case).
Another example is the Peano axioms with second-order induction, every model of this theory has to be isomorphic to the natural numbers.
Footnotes:
I wrote in some logic, because in first-order logic if there is an infinite model for $T$ then there is a model of any infinite cardinality. This means that there are many non-isomorphic models.
We can, however, salvage some characterization, and some theories are nice enough that they have the property that for some $\kappa$, all the models of cardinality $\kappa$ are isomorphic.
For example the theory of a dense linear order without endpoints have this property for $\kappa=\aleph_0$. In particular every linear order which is countable and dense and does not have maximum and minimum is isomorphic to the rational numbers.
Similarly the theory of algebraically closed fields of characteristics zero has this property for every $\kappa>\aleph_0$. So any algebraically closed field which contains the rational numbers and have cardinality $2^{\aleph_0}$ is isomorphic to the field of the complex numbers.