can you please some one explain me how the highlighted statement comes
im understanding all but not the last one please
can you please some one explain me how the highlighted statement comes
im understanding all but not the last one please
On
Since $d$ is a metric, and $k$ is in $(0,1)$, we can say that $\varphi$ is a non-negative function. Hence what you have by the inequality before is $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}d(T^i(x),T^{i+1}(x))\leq \varphi(T(x)) - $(something non-negative) which is of course less or equal than $\varphi(T(x))$.
The fact that $\varphi$ is bounded follows from the fact that $T$ is a contraction map.
From the inequality above the highlighted one, for every $1\leq n < m$, one can see that $$\sum_{i=n}^md(T^i,T^{i+1}) \leq \phi(T^n(x))-\phi(T^{m+1})\leq \phi(T^n(x)).$$ Where the last inequality holds because $\phi$ takes values in $\Bbb R^+=[0,\infty)$. Letting $m\to \infty$ gives you the desired expression.