In analysis and topology, the middle third Cantor set $C$ is often a very interesting topic of discussion. My question is that is it possible to have some sort of measure preserving bijection $f: C\rightarrow S^2$, where $S^2$ is the standard unit sphere, such that this produces a Banach-Tarski decomposition for $C$? Wagon's book $\textit{The Banach-Tarski Paradox}$ actually shows that it is quite possible to have a Banach-Tarski decomposition on intervals. If there really is some sort of measure preserving bijection as I asked in my question, what exactly would it be? This might just be an open problem that has yet to be answered...
2026-03-29 02:31:22.1774751482
Banach-Tarski Paradox on the middle third Cantor set
441 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-MEASURE-THEORY
- Lipschitz continuous function whose derivative is not continuous almost everywhere
- Relative volume of $\delta$-fattening (neighborhood) of a compact set
- Surface Area in $R^n$
- Excess of Caccioppoli sets
- What type of measure is this?
- Lipschitz extension of affine function to whole space
- Is it true $\mu (A+B) = \mu (A) + \mu(B) $ for bounded sets $ A, B \subset R $
- The Lebesgue measure as energy minimizer?
- Caratheodory's construction
- Upper Bounding Hausdorff Measure
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As Henning says, whether or not you have a Banach-Tarski paradox depends on what symmetries of the Cantor set you allow. My understanding is that you want to allow all measure preserving continuous bijections. With this understanding, the Cantor has a Banach-Tarski decomposition.
Note that we can identify the Cantor set with the $2$-adic integers, $\mathbb{Z}_2$, and the $2$-adic measure is the standard measure on the Cantor set.
Let $F$ denote the free group on $2$ generators. Let $\Gamma(2)$ be the group of integer matrices $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ with $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \right) \equiv \left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right) \mod 2$ and let $P \Gamma(2)$ be the quotient of $\Gamma(2)$ by the cetnral order $2$ subgroup generated by $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$. As is well known, $F$ is isomorphic to $P\Gamma(2)$.
Let $P\Gamma(2)$ act on $\mathbb{Z}_2$ by the Möbius transformation formula $z \mapsto \frac{az+b}{cz+d}$. Note that, since $c$ is even and $d$ is odd, the denominator is a unit of $\mathbb{Z}_2$, so the image of the map lands in $\mathbb{Z}_2$. I claim that this map is continuous and measure preserving. Specifically, I note that this map descends to a well defined map from $\mathbb{Z}/2^k \mathbb{Z}$ to itself. Thus, if we know $z$ with accuracy $2^{-k}$, we also know $\frac{az+b}{cz+d}$ with this accuracy (establishing continuity). And, for any open set of the form $U:=\{ u : u \equiv v \mod 2^k \}$, the image of $U$ is also of this form and thus has the same measure (establishing preservation of measure).
So we have a measure preserving action of $F$ on the Cantor set where each element of $F$ fixes at most two points. Now follow the standard proof of Banach-Tarski.
ADDED: Sachin asks below for elaboration. I am going to assume that you are familiar with the $2$-adic numbers, which are roughly base $2$ numbers with expansions that run infinitely to the left. If you're not familiar, follow the Wikipedia link.
I believe you are describing an element of the Cantor set by a binary sequence $(a_0, a_1, a_2, \ldots, ) \in \{ 0,1 \}^{\mathbb{N}}$. One can identify this with the point $2 \sum a_i 3^{-1}$ on the real line, in the standard "middle thirds" description of the Cantor set. A basis of neighborhoods for the Cantor set is given by the sets $U(b_0 b_1 \cdots b_{k-1}) = \{ (a_0, a_1, \ldots) : a_i=b_i \ \mathrm{for}\ i<k \}$. As I understand it, you are using the measure where $U(b_0 b_1 \cdots b_{k-1})$ has measure $2^{-k}$.
I am identifying $(a_0, a_1, \ldots)$ with the $2$-adic number $\sum a_k 2^k$. This sum is of course very nonconvergent in the standard sense, but it does converge (basically by definition) $2$-adically. This identification shows that the Cantor set is homeomorphic with the $2$-adic integers. The measure I am using on the $2$-adics (which is the standard one) is the one where $U(b_0 b_1 \cdots b_{k-1})$ has measure $2^{-k}$.
What I get from the $2$-adics which is new is the ring structure which allows me to write down the maps $x \mapsto \frac{ax+b}{cx+d}$. These would be something very unmotivated looking without the apparatus of infinite base $2$ expansions.