How to show that all normally open covers form a base for the fine uniformity $\mu_F$? If $\mathcal{B}$ is the collection of all normally open covers, we first need to show that $\mathcal{B}$ is a subcollection of $\mu_F$. Then we have to show that every $\mathcal{U}$ in $\mu_F$ is refined by some cover from $\mathcal{B}$. How to go about the proof?
2026-02-23 18:57:13.1771873033
Base of Fine Uniformity
180 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in UNIFORM-SPACES
- Is $\approx$ actually an entourage?
- What is the hausdorff completion of this uniform structure on the real line?
- Completeness of Continuous Functions on Uniform Spaces
- What is the relation between chain connected with connected in uniform space?
- Is there a version of closing lemma in the case of uniform space?
- Closure of $A$ with respect to uniform topology
- The interior of the elements of a uniform structure $D$ is also base for $D$
- Why are compact Hausdorff spaces divisible - and other uniformity related questions
- Question about totally disconnected compact uniform space
- totally disconnected compact Hausdorff uniform space
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Following Willard, General Topology, 36.15 (which is what you seem to be doing as well):
some definitions recap: A sequence $(\mathcal{U}_n)_{n \ge 1}$ of covers of $X$ is said to be a normal sequence, when for all $n\ge 1$: $\mathcal{U}_{n+1}\prec^\ast \mathcal{U}_n$.
A cover $\mathcal{U}$ is said to be a normal cover, if there is a normal sequence $(\mathcal{U}_n)_{n \ge 1}$ as above with $\mathcal{U}_1 = \mathcal{U}$, so it can be star-refined as often we like.
Note that by the definition of covering uniformities, all covers in a covering uniformity are normal covers. Such covers need not be open and they often aren't.
A family of covers is called a normal family, if every member of the family is star-refined by some member of the family. The set of members of a normal sequence is a normal family. Any normal family of covers generates a unique smallest uniformity containing that family, and then this family is called a "subbase" for the generated uniformity.
An open cover $\mathcal{U}$ of $X$ is said to be "normally open" when there is a normal sequence $(\mathcal{U}_n)_{n \ge 1}$ of open covers with $\mathcal{U}_1 =\mathcal{U}$. Such a cover is clearly normal but in a special way, as it can be star-refined by open covers (instead of just covers).
We start in a uniformisable space $(X,\mu)$ with induced topology $\mathcal{T}_\mu$. Let $\mu_F$ be the corresponding "fine" uniformity, which is the largest (by inclusion) covering uniformity, that induces $\mathcal{T}_\mu$. We constructed it here
So let $\mathscr{B}$ be the collection of all normally open (in said topology) covers of $X$.
Now take some (fixed for now) normally open $\mathcal{U}$ from $\mathscr{B}$, and construct the promised normal sequence of open covers $(\mathcal{U}_n)_{n \ge 1}$ with $\mathcal{U}_1 = \mathcal{U}$. Then in this answer I showed that $\mu \cup \{\mathcal{U}_n \mid n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ is a normal family that induces a uniformity $\mu'$ such that $\mathcal{T}_{\mu'} = \mathcal{T}_\mu$. As $\mathcal{U} \in \mu'$ and $\mu'$ is a uniformity inducing $\mathcal{T}_\mu$, we also know $\mu' \subseteq \mu_F$ by maximality and so $\mathcal{U} \in \mu_F$.
We have shown (as $\mathcal{U} \in \mathscr{B}$ was arbitrary), that indeed $\mathscr{B} \subseteq \mu_F$.
Now we use the following
Proof sketch of Fact: let $\mathcal{U} \in \mu$ and let $\mathcal{V} \in \mu$ be such that $\mathcal{V} \prec^\ast \mathcal{U}$. Then note that $\mathcal{O}=\{\operatorname{st}(x,\mathcal{V}): x \in X\}$ is an open cover of $X$ (in the induced topology) (note that $\mathcal{V}\prec \mathcal{O}$, so that $\mathcal{O} \in \mu$, as required) that refines $\mathcal{U}$.
This Fact implies
Proof of Fact 2: Let $\mathcal{U} \in \mu$ be an open cover Proof: Define $\mathcal{U}_1 = \mathcal{U}$. Having defined $\mathcal{U}_n$ for some $n$, such that $\mathcal{U}_n$ is an open cover from $\mu$, let $\mathcal{V}$ be any cover in $\mu$ such that $\mathcal{V}\prec^\ast \mathcal{U}_n$, which can be done as $\mathcal{U}_n \in \mu$ and then by the above fact there is an open cover $\mathcal{O}$ in $\mu$ such that $\mathcal{O} \prec \mathcal{V}$. Standard facts about refinements learn us that:
$$\mathcal{O} \prec \mathcal{V} \prec^\ast \mathcal{U}_n \implies \mathcal{O} \prec^\ast \mathcal{U}_n$$
allowing us to go in the recursion by defining $\mathcal{U}_{n+1} = \mathcal{O}$ keeping everything open and in $\mu$, so we can continue. This recursively defined sequence shows that $\mathcal{U}$ is indeed normally open.
Now take any $\mathcal{U} \in \mu_F$. Then by the above fact, there is an open cover $\mathcal{O} \in \mu$ refining it. By Fact 2, it is normally open so a member of $\mathscr{B}$. This shows $\mathscr{B}$ is a base for $\mu_F$.