Consider the expansion of $(a+b)^9$. The coefficient of the term $a^7b^2$ is the number of ways to select $7$ a's from the $9$ factors of $a+b$. Why is this the case? Furthermore, this seems like an intuitive proof of why binomial coefficients are related to combinatorics. However is there a rigorous mathematical proof that shows the coefficients are the same as combinations?
2026-04-24 00:26:15.1776990375
Binomial coefficients relationship to combinations
83 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BINOMIAL-COEFFICIENTS
- Newton binomial expansion
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Solving an equation involving binomial coefficients
- Asymptotics for partial sum of product of binomial coefficients
- What is wrong with this proof about a sum of binomial coefficients?
- Find sum of nasty series containing Binomial Coefficients
- Alternating Binomial Series Summation.
- $x+\frac{1}{x}$ is an integer
- Finding value of $S-T$ in $2$ binomial sum.
- how to reduce $(1-\alpha)^{T-i}$ into a sum
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let's consider the expansion $(a+b)^n$. $$(a+b)^n = (a+b)(a+b)...(a+b)$$
In the above product we multiply $(a+b)$ $n$ times, so how many terms will we have after we expand?
At first we calculate $(a+b)(a+b)$ which will be a quantity having $2 \cdot 2 =4$ terms being summed. We then calculate that quantity multiplied by $(a + b)$, so we will have a quantity consisting of $2 \cdot 4 = 8$ terms being summed. I think that it is now clear that after $n$ multiplications we will have a sum of $2^n$ terms.
The fact that we are summing $2^n$ terms is the first hint towards the fact that the coefficients have something to do with the number of ways of choosing a subset of size $k$ from a set of size $n$, since $\Sigma_{k=0}^{n}$ $n \choose k$ = $2^n$.
Now the quantity $a^kb^{n-k}$ will certainly appear in the final sum for any $0\leq k \leq n$ but how many times will it appear?
Well the number of times that $a^kb^{n-k}$ appears is equivalent to the number of ways of choosing which $a′s$ of k brackets to multiply out of the $n$ brackets and then multiplying them by the rest of the $b′s$ in the rest of the $n-k$ brackets without the order mattering which is $n \choose k$
So $(a+b)^n = \Sigma_{k=0}^{n}$ $n \choose k$ $a^kb^{n-k}$