There is a bipartite graph $G = (U, V, E)$ which is $|U| = |V|$, and the number of complete matching is only $1$.
Is this graph always contain at least $1$ vertex that $deg(v) = 1 \ (v \in V)$?
If so, how to prove it?
2026-03-26 17:46:40.1774547200
Bipartite graph which number of complete matching is $1$, has at least one $degree=1$ vertex?
134 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in PERMUTATIONS
- A weird automorphism
- List Conjugacy Classes in GAP?
- Permutation does not change if we multiply by left by another group element?
- Validating a solution to a combinatorics problem
- Selection of at least one vowel and one consonant
- How to get the missing brick of the proof $A \circ P_\sigma = P_\sigma \circ A$ using permutations?
- Probability of a candidate being selected for a job.
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- Expected "overlap" between permutations of a multiset
- Selecting balls from infinite sample with certain conditions
Related Questions in BIPARTITE-GRAPHS
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Perfect Matching
- Complete bipartite planar graphs
- Is the graph described below bipartite?
- Prove that an even order ($n=2k$) graph without cycle of order 3, has a size $m \le k^2$
- min cost flow in offline bipartite graph problem
- Rearrangeable matrix visualization
- Is there a name for Chain of complete bipartite graphs?
- Determine if G is bipartite. Find a maximal path and Eulerian circuit in G.
- Does this graph have a Hamiltonian cycle?
Related Questions in MATCHING-THEORY
- Prove that a simple connected graph has even numbers of vertex
- Lexicographical covering of boolean poset
- Cantor-Bernstein-Schröder Theorem: small proof using Graph Theory, is this correct?
- All stable matchings of a given bipartite graph cover the same vertices.
- Maximum matching saturating a vertex
- Triangle inequality and graphs (min cost matching graph)
- Stable-Matching Algorithm with film upgrades
- Need help understanding stable matching proof
- Graph Theory - Matching
- Solving Quadratic program for finding perfect matching in polynomial time
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The statement is trivally false if $|U|=|V|=0$, so assume otherwise.
Suppose by way of contradiction that each vertex in $V$ has degree $>1$. The complete matching of $G$ gives a bijection $f:V\to U$. For each $v\in V$ we can pick an edge $(v,g(v))$ with $g(v)\neq f(v)$ (note that $g$ need not be a bijection). Since $V$ is finite, the usual pigeonhole argument implies $(f^{-1}g)^n(v_0)=v_0$ for some $n>0$ and $v_0\in V$. Now define a new map $h:V\to U$ given by $$ h(v)=\begin{cases} g(v)&\text{if }v=(f^{-1}g)^i(v_0)\text{ for some }i,\\ f(v)&\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$ Note that $(v,h(v))$ is an edge for all $v\in V$. Also $h(v_0)=g(v_0)\neq f(v_0)$. Finally consider any $u\in U$. If $f^{-1}(u)=(f^{-1}g)^i(v_0)$ for some $i$ then $$ u=f\left((f^{-1}g)^{n+i}(v_0)\right) =g\left((f^{-1}g)^{n+i-1}(v_0)\right) =h\left((f^{-1}g)^{n+i-1}(v_0)\right). $$ Otherwise $u=f(f^{-1}(u))=h(f^{-1}(u))$. Thus $h$ is surjective, so it is a complete matching of $G$ distinct from $f$, contradicting the hypothesis.