Denote by $X$ the image under the immersion $RP^2 \to R^3$ (that is, the Boy's surface). At each point $x \in X$ consider a small orthogonal segment that is centered at the point $x$. Denote by $S$ the set of all endpoints of these segments. Thus, we obtain a new surface $S$. What is this? I think it should be $S^2$ but I cannot prove this. This construction looks like orientable double cover but there is a problem: the Boy's surface has self-intersection points (the whole curve of such points), therefore for the natural map $p: S \to X$ the preimage $p^{-1} (x)$ for any self-intersection point $x$ consists of 4 points instead of 2. So, it is not a covering or even not a ramified covering with finite number of ramification points, so we cannot use Riemann-Hurwitz formula to find the Euler characteristic of $S$. Am I missing something? How can it be done?
2026-04-02 11:35:06.1775129706
Boy's surface and normal vectors
58 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in COVERING-SPACES
- Definition of regular covering maps: independent of choice of point
- Universal cover $\mathbb{S}^3 \rightarrow SO(3)$ through Quaternions.
- How to find a minimal planar covering of a graph
- Questions from Forster's proof regarding unbranched holomorphic proper covering map
- $\mathbb{S}^2$ and $\mathbb{RP}^2$ are the only compact surfaces with finite number of covers.
- Is the monodromy action of the universal covering of a Riemann surface faithful?
- Left half of complex plane and graph of logarithm are diffeomorphic?
- regular covering proof
- The map $p : S^1 → S^1$ given by $p(z) = z^2$ is a covering map. Generalize to $p(z) = z^n$.
- If $H \le \pi_1(X,x)$ is conjugate to $P_*(\pi_1(Y, y))$, then $H \cong P_*(\pi_1(Y, y'))$ for some $y' \in P^{-1}(x)$
Related Questions in PROJECTIVE-SPACE
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- Hausdorff Distance Between Projective Varieties
- Understanding line bundles on $\mathbb{P}_k^1$ using transition functions
- Definitions of real projective spaces
- Doubts about computation of the homology of $\Bbb RP^2$ in Vick's *Homology Theory*
- Very ample line bundle on a projective curve
- Realize the locus of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$ as a projective variety.
- If some four of given five distinct points in projective plane are collinear , then there are more than one conic passing through the five points
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Say your surface is parametrized by some smooth function $f(x,y)$ (this can be said because Boy's surface is a smooth immersion of $\mathbb RP^2$ into $\mathbb R^3$). Then you consider $$ g_\varepsilon(x,y) = f(x,y) + \varepsilon \cdot \frac{\partial_xf(x,y)\times \partial_yf(x,y)}{\|\partial_xf(x,y)\times \partial_yf(x,y)\|}=:f(x,y) + \varepsilon \cdot n(x,y), $$ so $g_\varepsilon$ is just a normal shift of $f$. Since $f$ is an immersion, the vector $n(x,y)$ is always defined and its length equals $1$ (and moreover, $n$ is smooth as well). Therefore you conclude that $ g_\varepsilon - f = \varepsilon n $ becomes arbitrarily small if $\varepsilon \to 0$. Regarding first derivatives you see that first derivatives of the difference between $g_\varepsilon - f$ are given by $\varepsilon\cdot \partial_xn$ and $\varepsilon \cdot \partial_yn$ respectively. Again they become arbitrarily small, provided $\varepsilon \to 0$ and you conclude that $g_\varepsilon$ and $f$ are $C^1$-close. From there you get that $g$ is again an immersion since immersions form an open set in the $C^1$-topology.