I would like to compare mortgages on a $100,000 loan to see which is most economical.
Option 1
5 years at $1.89\%$ then 5 years at $3.78\%$
Option 2
10 years at $2.49\%$
Is it simply a matter of calculating the compounding amount for $\$$50,000 at 1.89, then a further $\$$50,000 at 3.78%? then comparing with the compounding amount for $\$$100,000 at 2.49%?
When I do this, the result is counter-intuitive.
Using the formula for monthly payment $$M = 100,000\cdot \frac{\frac{i}{12}(1+\frac{i}{12})^n}{(1+\frac{i}{12})^n-1}$$ where $n$ is the number of months and $i$ is the annual interest rate.
$10$ years @ $2.49\%$ is a monthly payment of $\$942.24$.
Rearranging the equation, $5$ years @ $1.89\%$ with a monthly payment of $\$942.24$ will reduce $\$100 000$ to $\$46094.87$
A further $5$ years @ $3.78\%$ with a monthly payment of $\$942.24$ will reduce $\$46094.87$ to $-\$5344.72$.
In other words, option $1$ will save you $\$5344.72$. This is logical as paying off more of the principal for the first $5$ years with a lower interest rate is more beneficial even with a slightly higher average interest.