Almost all square matrices have an (unpivoted) LU decomposition, but some don't. The question I have is whether - assuming $M$ is a square matrix over $\mathbb R$ or $\mathbb C$ which does not admit an LU decomposition - there is some scalar $\lambda$ such that $M + \lambda I$ does have an LU decomposition. I suspect that the answer is yes, but I'm not confident, and I don't know how to show it.
2026-03-25 11:05:13.1774436713
Can a matrix not admitting an LU decomposition be shifted so that it does admit an LU decomposition?
22 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LU-DECOMPOSITION
- inverting a matrix using the LU decomposition approach
- LU Factorization. Finding L and A given y, b and U
- Is it okay transposing each matrix elements?
- Why WolframAlpha does LU decomposition with pivoting even when it isn't needed?
- Cost of LU decomposition of a Symmetric Matrix
- LU/LUP decomposition: can some of U's diagonal elements be zero?
- Cost of LU decomposition (time cost)
- Why (which advantages) we use different matrix factorization algorithms?
- What is the computation time of LU-, Cholesky and QR-decomposition?
- How SVD for the frobenius norm has been calculated?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I would use Doolittle's algorithm (which is equivalent to Gaussian elimination without the pivoting) to prove that the answer is yes over $\mathbb R$ or $\mathbb C$, but not in a way that's valid for an arbitrary field. One can pick $\lambda$ very large, so that after performing the shift $M \leftarrow M + \lambda I$, each row-addition in the algorithm $R_i \leftarrow R_i + x_j R_j$ is done with very small $x_j$. This results in the diagonal entries of the matrix not changing much.
So the answer is yes over $\mathbb R$ and $\mathbb C$.