Can a metrizable TVS be induced by a non-translation invariant metric?

290 Views Asked by At

Is it possible to have a topological vector space $(X, \tau)$ with its topology induced by a metric $d$ which is not translation invariant?

I'm asking this because in Rudin's 'Functional Analysis' Theorem 1.28, he automatically assumed the metric of a metrizable TVS is translation invariant (he defined a metrizable TVS to be one which topology can be induced by a metric, no requirement on the metric being translation invariant or not). It seems that Rudin is usually careful about his assumptions, so I wonder if I'm missing something?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

(I have withdrawn my earlier answer based on Tsang's justified criticism)

Metrizable topological spaces always satisfy the first axiom of countability (take the open balls with radius $1/n$).

In theorem 1.24 Rudin proves that if $X$ is a TVS with a countable local base then there is an invariant metric that is compatible with the topology. The proof involves a construction that is rather more elaborate than the one I tried in my earlier answer.

2
On

As mentioned in the answer above, it is quite elementary to prove that the existence a a metric inducing the topology of a topological vector space (t.v.s.) is equivalent to the existence of a translation invariant one. However, if you then want to speak about F-spaces, i.e. complete metrizable t.v.s., the equivalence of having a complete metric or a complete translation invariant metric is not so easy. This had been a question by Banach which was solved only about 30 years later by Victor Klee.