In other terms, is the set of optimization problems solvable using greedy algorithms contained fully within the set of optimization problems solvable by dynamic programming?
2026-03-25 23:34:48.1774481688
Can every optimization problem that can be solved by a greedy algorithm be solved using dynamic programming? Why, why not?
1.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGORITHMS
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Correct way to prove Big O statement
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- (logn)^(logn) = n^(log10+logn). WHY?
- Clarificaiton on barycentric coordinates
- Minimum number of moves to make all elements of the sequence zero.
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
- sources about SVD complexity
Related Questions in DYNAMIC-PROGRAMMING
- Dynamic programming for Knapsack problem
- DP algorithm for covering the distance between two points with a set of intervals
- Solution of an HJB equation in continuous time
- correctness for minimizing average completition time for scheduling problem with release times
- Zero-sum differential game
- An enclosing polygon with minimum area
- Divide set into two subsets of equal sum and maximum this sum
- Stochastic Dynamic Programming: Deriving the Steady-State for a Lottery
- How would you prove that a dynamic programming problem is solvable by a greedy algorithm?
- How to find minimal distances route for a trip of $t$ days, given distances for each stop?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The answer is yes in a rather trivial way: a locally optimal choice made by the greed approach is one of subproblems that would be considered by the dynamic programming approach.
However this does not entail that you should always use the dynamic programming approach because it may be inherently less efficient. For example, when you solve the shortest path problem in a graph, the dynamic programming approach necessarily implies solving it for all nodes as source. For this problem dynamic programming is thus less efficient (cubic time) than solving it only for two nodes (quadratic time—I'm assuming you just derive the straightforward algorithm, not using Fibonacci heaps.)