Can multiple generalized eigenvectors of higher rank get mapped to the same generalized eigenvector of lower rank?

29 Views Asked by At

I'm reading the wikipedia page for generalized eigenvectors, and I'm stuck on one part:

They show in the canonical basis section that (assuming a fixed eigenvalue $\lambda$ for the whole post), $\rho_k$, the number of linearly independent generalized eigenvectors of rank $k$, can be found by looking at the difference in ranks for adjacent powers of $(A - \lambda I)$:

$\rho_k = \text{rank}[(A - \lambda I)^{k-1}] - \text{rank}[(A - \lambda I)^k]$

I understand $\text{rank}[(A - \lambda I)^k]$ as looking at the dimension of the nullspace of $(A - \lambda I)^k$, so looking at that difference tells you how many generalized eigenvectors need $k$ (and not fewer) applications of $(A - \lambda I)$ to be mapped all the way to zero, which is the definition of a generalized eigenvector of rank $k$.

A generalized eigenvector of rank $k$ generates a Jordan Chain, by producing a generalized vector of rank $k - 1$ with each extra application of $(A - \lambda I)$, as they mention in the intro. And, that chain should all be linearly independent.

My question is: is it possible to have two generalized eigenvectors of rank $k$ both get mapped to the same generalized eigenvector of rank $k - 1$ by applying $(A - \lambda I)$ ? i.e., is it possible for the chains to "merge" ?

E.g., if $x$ is a generalized eigenvector of rank $k-1$ and $y_1 \neq y_2$ are generalized eigenvectors of rank $k$, is it possible to have:

$(A - \lambda I) y_1 = x$ and $(A - \lambda I) y_2 = x$ ?

My guess is no, because that implies that $(A - \lambda I) (y_1 - y_2) = 0$, which would mean that $(y_1 - y_2)$ is itself a generalized eigenvector of rank $1$, but I can't figure out how to see that intuitively.