enter image description here This is an argand Diagram to show 2d Imaginary-real plane solutions to a said root of a number jut there to illustrate the normal complex solutions.
2026-03-31 10:15:36.1774952136
Can numbers as well as having roots in the Imaginary-Real plane also be said to have roots as quaternions or higher complex forms? If so how?
39 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ROOTS
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Roots of a complex equation
- Do Irrational Conjugates always come in pairs?
- For $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ , $\deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Z}_q}(f, x^p - 1)) \geq \deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Q}}(f, x^p - 1))$
- The Heegner Polynomials
- Roots of a polynomial : finding the sum of the squares of the product of two roots
- Looking for references about a graphical representation of the set of roots of polynomials depending on a parameter
- Approximating the first +ve root of $\tan(\lambda)= \frac{a\lambda+b}{\lambda^2-ab}$, $\lambda\in(0,\pi/2)$
- Find suitable scaling exponent for characteristic polynomial and its largest root
- Form an equation whose roots are $(a-b)^2,(b-c)^2,(c-a)^2.$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Sure. The situation's no different from how a real number can have more complex roots than it has real roots. E.g. the fourth roots of $1$ in the reals are $1$ and $-1$, but in the complex numbers we get $i$ and $-i$ as well.
By embedding an algebraic structure $\mathcal{A}$ inside a larger algebraic structure $\mathcal{B}$ we can often get more variety at the cost of having fewer nice properties. In this case, our additional variety is "having more roots," and the nice property we lose is that the proof that an $n$th-degree polynomial over $\mathbb{C}$ has at most $n$ complex roots breaks down when we try to replace $\mathbb{C}$ with $\mathbb{H}$ (= the quaternions), and so there's no reason to not expect more roots to pop up. (As an exercise you might try to find out how many square roots $-1$ has in $\mathbb{C}$.)