This example challenges my understanding of $O(x)$ and $o(x)$ notation. One the one hand I have:
$$ A = B + o(x)$$
Another part of the paper uses big-O instead of little-o and says:
$$ C = D + O(\sqrt{x}) \stackrel{?}{=} D + o(x)$$
I am willing to take a huge sacrifice on the error term for simplicity, but I am struggling to see if this is correct. In particular, is it the case that: $\bbox[2px, border:2px solid #55FF88]{ \tfrac{1}{x}(C-D) \asymp 0 }$ or $\bbox[2px, border:2px solid #5588FF]{\tfrac{1}{x}(C-D) \sim 0}$ ?
Yes. If we have $f(x) \in O(\sqrt{x})$, then $f(x) < k\sqrt{x}$ for some $k$ and all $x$ sufficiently large.
Then we have $f(x) < \frac{k}{\sqrt{x}}x$, but since $\frac{k}{\sqrt{x}}$ gets abritarily small, we can conclude that $f(x) < cx$ or all $c$ and all $x$ sufficiently large. This is equivalent to $f(x) \in o(x)$.
We can make much stronger claims. For example $f(x) \in o(\sqrt{x}\ln(x))$ would be true too.