A friend told me that, the same way you can represent a 3-vector as an imaginary quaternion then conjugate it by a unit quaternion with real part $\cos(\frac{\theta}{2})$ to rotate it by $\theta$ around the axis of the imaginary part, you can do the same thing to a 7-vector and a unit octonion. Can't find anything verifying this-if its true a source for the derivation for the formula would be appreciated (as would one for the quaternion formula).
2026-03-25 09:26:36.1774430796
Can octonions be used to rotate 7-dimensional vectors?
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in VECTORS
- Proof that $\left(\vec a \times \vec b \right) \times \vec a = 0$ using index notation.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Why does AB+BC=AC when adding vectors?
- Prove if the following vectors are orthonormal set
- Stokes theorem integral, normal vector confusion
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Given two non-diagonal points of a square, find the other 2 in closed form
- $dr$ in polar co-ordinates
- How to find reflection of $(a,b)$ along $y=x, y = -x$
Related Questions in ROTATIONS
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- why images are related by an affine transformation in following specific case?(background in computer vision required)
- Proving equations with respect to skew-symmetric matrix property
- Finding matrix linear transformation
- A property of orthogonal matrices
- Express 2D point coordinates in a rotated and translated CS
- explicit description of eigenvector of a rotation
- Finding the Euler angle/axis from a 2 axes rotation but that lies on the original 2 axes' plane
- How to find a rectangle's rotation amount that is inscribed inside an axis-aligned rectangle?
- Change of basis with rotation matrices
Related Questions in OCTONIONS
- How does linear algebra over the octonions and other division algebras work?
- Unital nonalternative real division algebras of dimension 8
- Is it possible to plug hypercomplex numbers into the Riemann Zeta function?
- Why is not possible to show that $S^7$ is a Lie Group in the following way?
- The order of elements in finite octonions
- Classification of subalgebras of composition algebras
- Do the octonions contain infinitely many copies of the quaternions?
- If there can exist a model of the octonions without complex numbers
- If there are any 3nion, 5nion, 7nion, 9nion, 10nion, etc.
- The isotropy subgroup of the action of Spin(7) on the Grassmannian G(3,8)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First off, some facts. Every isometry fixing the origin is an orthogonal linear transformation of space, the group of all such linear operators is called $O(V)$. The ones which preserve the orientation of space (equivalently, are path-connected to the identity map) form a subgroup called the special orthogonal group $SO(V)$, which has index two.
A hyperplane is a codimension one subspace, or equivalently the orthogonal complement of a 1D line, and a reflection is an isometry which acts as negative one on a line and as the identity on its orthogonal complement (a hyperplane). Reflections are in $O(V)$ but not $SO(V)$, and every isometry is a composition of reflections. In particular, a composition of reflections across the complements of lines $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ will be a rotation in the 2D plane $\mathrm{span}(\ell_1,\ell_2)$ by an angle twice that of the angle between $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$.
A plane rotation is a map which acts as a usual rotation on a 2D subspace and acts as the identity map on the plane's orthogonal complement. Plane rotations are elements of $SO(V)$. Two plane rotations with respect to orthogonal planes will commute with each other. Every rotation, i.e. every element of $SO(V)$, is a product of plane rotations with respect to a collection of pairwise orthogonal 2D planes. If $R$ is a plane rotation with respect to the (oriented) plane $\Pi$ by an angle of $\theta$, and $S$ is any other isometry, then $SRS^{-1}$ will be a plane rotation with respect to the oriented plane $S\Pi$ by an angle of $\theta$.
In a normed division algebra $\mathbb{K}$, there is a multiplicative norm $|\cdot|$ (i.e. it satisfies $|xy|=|x||y|$), and it induces an inner product $\langle-,-\rangle$ satisfying $|x|^2=\langle x,y\rangle$. The imaginary elements are those that are perpendicular to $1$ with respect to this inner product. If $u,v$ are orthogonal imaginaries, then they anticommute, i.e. $uv=-vu$
More generally, for any imaginaries $u$ and $v$, there is a formula $uv=-\langle u,v\rangle+u\times v$. For quaternions, $u\times v$ is the usual cross product, but for octonions it is a much less symmetrical seven-dimensional cross product (which has symmetry group $G_2\subset SO(7)$).
The division algebra $\mathbb{K}$ will also be alternative. This means every pair of elements generates an associative subalgebra, even if $\mathbb{K}$ itself isn't associative. Concretely this means the algebraic expressions $aab$, $aba$ and $baa$ are unambiguous without parenthesization for all $a,b$.
The square roots of negative one are precisely the unit pure imaginaries $u$. Since $\mathbb{K}$ is alternative, $u(ux)=(uu)x=-x$ makes sense, and thus $\mathbb{O}$ becomes a left and right four-dimensional complex vector space over $\mathbb{R}[u]$ with scalar multiplication from the left and right. The two sides don't necessarily match: multiplying anything in $\mathrm{span}(1,u)$ on either side does the same thing, but $uv=-vu$ for all $v$ in the orthogonal complement of $\mathrm{span}(1,u)$.
In the quaternions $\mathbb{H}$, given any unit imaginary $u$ we can form an oriented orthonormal basis $1,u,v,w$ (satisfying the same relations as $1,i,j,k$). Then multiplying by $e^{\theta u}=\cos(\theta)+\sin(\theta)u$ on the left will rotate $\mathrm{span}(1,u)$ and $\mathrm{span}(v,w)$ each by $\theta$, whereas right multiplication will rotate $\mathrm{span}(1,u)$ and $\mathrm{span}(v,w)$ by $\theta$ and $-\theta$ respectively. If we combine the two actions using a half angle, we find that $x\mapsto e^{(\theta/2)u}xe^{-(\theta/2)u}$ acts as the identity on $\mathrm{span}(1,u)$ and a rotation by $\theta$ on $\mathrm{span}(v,w)$. If we restrict this conjugation action to the 3D subspace of imaginary quaternions, this is rotation around the oriented axis $\mathbb{R}u$ by an angle of $\theta$.
The unit quaternions are closed under multiplication and form a group called $\mathrm{Sp}(1)$ or $S^3$ (some abusively call it $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ which I dislike). Using this conjugation action, we get a group homomorphism $\mathrm{Sp}(1)\to\mathrm{SO}(3)$ with kernel $\pm1$.
The same thing happens in $\mathbb{O}$, except now $e^{(\theta/2)u}xe^{-(\theta/2)u}$ will be a rotation in three different planes within the 7D space of imaginary octonions. I don't see any obvious description of which three planes (indeed, the three planes are not an invariant - one could use different sets of three planes to describe the same rotation, such is the ambiguity of isoclinic rotations). I assume they generate $SO(7)$ but it's not clear to me how. One could presumably check using some calculation with lie algebras but that doesn't sound fun or enlightening.
For $\mathbb{O}$ we could also do the following. The effect of $x\mapsto e^{(\theta/2)u}xe^{(\theta/2)u}$ is the plane rotation by $\theta$ with respect to the 2D plane $\mathrm{span}(1,u)$. We can conjugate two of these plane rotations to get an arbitrary plane rotation of $\mathbb{O}$, which generates all of them in $SO(8)$.
Alternatively, note that $x\mapsto -\overline{x}$ (where $\overline{x}$ is conjugation - it negates the imaginary part while preserve the real part) is a reflection across the hyperplane orthogonal to the real axis, i.e. across the subspace of imaginary elements. If we conjugate this reflection by a rotation from $1$ to $q$ (e.g. left multiplication by $q$, where $q$ is a unit quaternion), we get $x\mapsto q(-\overline{qx})=-q\overline{x}q^{-1}$ which is reflection across the hyperplane orthogonal to $q$. If we do this for both $p$ and $q$, we get that $x\mapsto p(qxq^{-1})p^{-1}$ is some plane rotation.
This gives another way to see that multiplication on the left and right by unit octonions generates $SO(8)$. For quaternions, in fact we have a $2$-to-$1$ group homomorphism $\mathrm{Sp}(1)\times\mathrm{Sp}(1)\to SO(4)$.
Far less obviously, since $u^2=-|u|^2$ for imaginary octonions, we get a left action of the Clifford algebra $\mathrm{Cliff}(7)$ on $\mathbb{O}\cong\mathbb{R}^8$. From the classification of Clifford algebras, we know $\mathrm{Cliff}(7)\cong M_8(\mathbb{R})\oplus M_8(\mathbb{R})$. Since the algebra representation $\mathrm{Cliff}(7)\to\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathbb{O})$ is nontrivial, by checking dimensions and using the fact the only ideals are the two summands we see the map is surjective. Therefore, every rotation of $\mathbb{O}$ can be attained simply by left multiplying by enough pure imaginary octonions. (The same works on the right side as well.)