For example, we have two hermitian matrices $$A=\left( \begin{matrix} 1& 0\\ 0& -1\\ \end{matrix} \right) ,B=\left( \begin{matrix} 0& 1\\ 1& 0\\ \end{matrix} \right) .$$ And for this special case, I can find another two hermitian matrices by placing $A$ and $B$ as the principal submatrix commute as follows: $$\tilde{A}=\left( \begin{matrix} 1& 0& -1\\ 0& -1& 1\\ -1& 1& 0\\ \end{matrix} \right) ,\tilde{B}=\left( \begin{matrix} 0& 1& 1\\ 1& 0& 1\\ 1& 1& 0\\ \end{matrix} \right) .$$ I wonder if there exists general theorems guarantee that we can always find two enlarged commuting hermitian matrix like this?
2026-03-27 07:49:44.1774597784
Can we always let two uncommute hermitian matrices $A$ and $B$ commute by enlarge the dimension?
142 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in HERMITIAN-MATRICES
- Let $M$ be an $n \times n$ complex matrix. Prove that there exist Hermitian matrices $A$ and $B$ such that $M = A + iB$
- Product of two Hermitian matrices
- Eigenvectors of a Hermitian matrix
- Does matrix modulus satisfy triangle inequality for Loewner order?
- Prove sum of products of Hermitian matrices to be Hermitian
- What is dimension over $\mathbb R$ of the space of $n\times n$ Hermitian matrices?
- Nearest positive semidefinite matrix to a complex-valued Hermitian matrix
- SVD for Hermitian Matrix
- How does one prove the determinant inequality $\det\left(6(A^3+B^3+C^3)+I_{n}\right)\ge 5^n\det(A^2+B^2+C^2)$?
- A normal matrix with real eigenvalues is Hermitian
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is a partial answer. Every pair of Hermitian $n\times n$ matrices can be embedded, as leading principal submatrices, in a pair of commuting Hermitian $m\times m$ matrices when $m\ge 2n-1$.
For convenience, I will call your two matrices $A_1$ and $A_2$ (instead of $A$ and $B$). When $c>0$ is sufficiently large, $A_1+cI_n$ is positive definite. Hence $A_1+cI_n$ and $A_2+cI_n$ are simultaneously diagonalisable by congruence. That is, there exists a nonsingular matrix $P$ and two real diagonal matrices $D_1$ and $D_2$ such that $A_i+cI_n=PD_iP^\ast$ for each $i$. By absorbing an appropriate positive factor into $P$ and its inverse factor into $D_1$ and $D_2$, we may assume that $\|P\|_2=1$. Hence $\operatorname{rank}(I_n-P^\ast P)\le n-1\le\min(m-n,\,n)$ and there exists an $(m-n)\times n$ matrix $Q$ such that $Q^\ast Q=I_n-P^\ast P$. Thus $\pmatrix{P\\ Q}$ has orthonormal columns and we can complete it to a unitary matrix $U=\pmatrix{P&\ast\\ Q&\ast}$. Now \begin{aligned} H_i:=U\left[\pmatrix{D_i\\ &0}-cI_m\right]U^\ast &=U\pmatrix{D_i\\ &0}U^\ast-cI_m\\ &=\pmatrix{P\\ Q}D_i\pmatrix{P^\ast& Q^\ast}-cI_m\\ &=\pmatrix{PD_iP^\ast&\ast\\ \ast&\ast}-cI_m\\ &=\pmatrix{A_i+cI_n&\ast\\ \ast&\ast}-cI_m\\ &=\pmatrix{A_i&\ast\\ \ast&\ast}.\\ \end{aligned} Hence $H_1$ and $H_2$ are two commuting Hermitian matrices with $A_1$ and $A_2$ as their respective leading principal submatrices.