Can ZF set theory without the axiom of choice prove that every set $S$ can be endowed with a partial order $L$ which is a lattice? And if so, can ZF also prove that every set can be endowed with a partial order which is a distributive lattice? I know that ZF can't prove that every set can be linearly ordered. I would be very interested in knowing the relative strengths of ZF + "every set can be lattice ordered", ZF + "every set can be distributive lattice ordered", and ZF + "every set can be linearly ordered".
2026-04-04 00:59:28.1775264368
Can ZF prove that every set admits a lattice order?
136 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in LATTICE-ORDERS
- When a lattice is a lattice of open sets of some topological space?
- How to identify if a given Hasse diagram is a lattice
- How to find the smallest cardinal of a minimal generating set of a lattice
- Finding a poset with a homogeneity property
- Why is the "distributive lattice" structure of domino tilings significant?
- Two lattice identities
- Quickly determining whether given lattice is a distributive lattice from a given Hasse diagram
- Characteristic of a lattice that subsets contain their meets and joins
- Equalities in Heyting algebras
- Show that $(\operatorname{Up}(P),\subset)$ is a distributive lattice
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Working in ZF.
It has been pointed out in comments that any set can be ordered as a complete modular lattice, namely, with all elements incomparable except the top and bottom elements.
It is consistent that there are sets which can't be distributive-lattice ordered, namely, any amorphous set. An amorphous set is an infinite set which does not contain two disjoint infinite subsets. It's consistent with ZF that such sets exist.
Proposition. No amorphous lattice is distributive.
Proof. Let $L$ be an amorphous lattice. We call $x$ a successor of $y$ if $x\gt y$, a predecessor of $y$ if $x\lt y$; "almost all" means "all but finitely many."
Suppose infinitely many (therefore almost all) elements have infinitely many successors. Let $S$ be the (cofinite) set of all elements with infinitely many successors (and therefore only a finite number of predecessors). Then each $x\in S$ has a successor $y\in S$, and $y$ has more predecessors than $x$. Thus the number of predecessors of an element takes infinitely many different (finite) values, which is impossible since $L$ is amorphous. We conclude that almost all elements have finitely many successors.
Let $A$ be the (cofinite) set of all elements with finitely many successors. Let $A_n$ be the set of all elements with exactly $n$ successors. Since $A$ is amorphous, one of the sets $A_n$ is cofinite; fix that $n$. Let $F=L\setminus A_n$.
Plainly $A_n$ is an antichain; thus, if $x,y\in A_n$, $x\ne y$, then $x\land y\in F$ and $x\lor y\in F$. Since $F$ is a finite set, it follows by the finite Ramsey theorem that there are three distinct elements $x,y,z\in A_n$ with $x\land y=x\land z=y\land z$ and $x\lor y=x\lor z=y\lor z$. That is, $L$ embeds the nondistributive diamond lattice $M_3$, and $x\land(y\lor z)\gt(x\land y)\lor(x\land z)$.
Comment. This is only a partial answer, as I have no idea whether "every set can be distributive-lattice ordered" is weaker than "every set can be linearly ordered."