Given an Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ and $x,y,z\in\mathcal{H}$, let $x\odot y$ be the compact operator defined by $x\odot y(z)=\langle z,y\rangle x$. Assume $T$ is compact, is it the case that $$ T=\sum_{i,j}\lambda_{i,j}e_i\odot e_j$$ where $\{e_i:i\in I\}$ is an orthonormal base for $\mathcal{H}$? This is true for all $T$ in $B^2(\mathcal{H})$ i.e. for all $T$ such that $\sum_{j\in I}\langle T e_j,T e_j\rangle<\infty$ (see for example Proposition 3.4.14 of the GTM book Analysis NOW by Pedersen). But $B^2(\mathcal{H})$ is a proper subclass of the compact operators, what happens for the other compact operators? Is this decomposition fine as well?
2026-03-27 14:50:01.1774623001
canonical bases for compact operators
147 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-THEORY
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Closed kernel of a operator.
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Show that a sequence of operators converges strongly to $I$ but not by norm.
- Is the dot product a symmetric or anti-symmetric operator?
Related Questions in COMPACT-OPERATORS
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
- Operator in Hilbert space and its inverse
- Operators with infinite rank and kernel
- $AB$ is compact iff $BA$ is
- Does this imply compactness
- Existence of $v$,$\lvert\lvert v \rvert\rvert = 1$, such that $\langle Tv, Tv \rangle = \lvert\lvert T \rvert \rvert^2$
- Is $\lim_{n\to \infty} L {\varphi_n} = L \lim_{n\to \infty} {\varphi_n}$ for $L=I-A$ where $A$ is compact?
- Is it possible to construct a compact operator $A$ such that all polynomials of degree $1$ are in the nullspace of $I-A$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, there is such a decomposion, it is (more or less) the singular value decomposition of a compact operator.
To be more precise, let $(e_k)$ be an eigenbasis of $|T|$ and $U$ the partial isometry in the polar decomposition $T=U|T|$. By the spectral theorem for self-adjoint compact operators we have $$ |T|=\sum_i s_i e_i\odot e_i. $$ Thus, $$ T=U|T|=\sum_i s_i (Ue_i)\odot e_i=\sum_{i,j}s_i \langle Ue_i,e_j\rangle e_j\odot e_i. $$ The numbers $s_i$ are the eigenvalues of $|T|$ (taking into account their multiplicity), also called singular values of $T$.
Notice that the above series converges in operator norm for compact operators, whereas it converges in Hilbert-Schmidt norm for $T\in\mathcal{B}^2(\mathcal{H})$.
Both $\mathcal{B}^2(\mathcal{H})$ and the space of compact operators on $\mathcal{H}$ are therefore completions of the algebraic tensor product $\mathcal{H}\odot\mathcal{H}$, but with respect to different tensor norms (see here).