Its a well know fact that, in the class of metric spaces, the cardinal invariants density and weight agree. I would like to know if there is a example of a topological vector space $X$ for whose density $\operatorname{d}(X)$ does not agree with its weight $\operatorname{w}(X)$?
2025-01-12 19:15:19.1736709319
Cardinal functions on TVS
34 Views Asked by Jön https://math.techqa.club/user/jon/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Prove that $(\overline A)'=A'$ in T1 space
- Interesting areas of study in point-set topology
- Is this set open?
- Topology ad Geometry of $\mathbb{C}^n/\mathbb{Z}_k$
- Do any non-trivial equations hold between interior operators and closure operators on a topological space?
- Uniform and Compact Open Topology on spaces of maps from $\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$
- Proving set is open using continuous function
- Can we always parametrize simple closed curve with a rectifiable curve?
- Topology Munkres question 4, page100
- Prove that a linear continuum L is a convex subset of itself.
Related Questions in TOPOLOGICAL-VECTOR-SPACES
- equivalent definitions of weak topology on a topological vector space
- The existence of a limit point of a closed set
- Cardinal functions on TVS
- Basic neighborhoods in weak topology
- In a proof of the representation of linear functionals of topological vector space
- Advantange of having a complete topology on test functions
- Do I need topology to study stochastic process?
- weak topology and dual pairs
- linear independence in a dual pair
- linear independence in a dual pair and its consequence
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
For a simple example, consider $\mathbb R^{\mathbb R}$ (i.e., the set of all functions $\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$) with the usual product topology (that is, the topology of pointwise convergence).
As $\mathbb R$ is separable it follows by the Hewitt-Marczewski-Pondiczery Theorem that $\mathbb R^{\mathbb R}$ is separable, so $d ( \mathbb R^{\mathbb R} ) = \aleph_0$.
As $\mathbb R$ is not countable (and the space $\mathbb R$ is not trivial), the product is not second-countable, so $w ( \mathbb R^{\mathbb R} ) > \aleph_0$.