The following are homework questions I would like assistance on. I will do what I can to work on these problems; any feedback is helpful.
In the following problems, S is an infinite set (we do not know if it is denumerable or uncountable). Question 1:
Let $k$ be in P. Define $G_k(S)$ = {$A$: $A$ is an element of $\mathcal{P}(S))$, |$A$|=$k$ } Show that |$G_k(S)$| = |$S$|.
My intuition tells me that I will need to use Cantor's Theorem and the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem but I am having difficulty beginning the proof.
Question 2:
Let $C$ be a denumerable collection of sets and for every $T$ in C, T is equipotent to S.
Show that $|\bigcup C| = |S|$
Question 3:
Let $F(S)$ $=$ {$A$: $A$ is an element of $\mathcal{P}(S)$, $S$ \ $A$ is finite} Show that |$F(S)$| = |$S$|
For #1, if $S$ is infinite, then $S \times S$ is equipotent to $S$. If you can use this, you can also use that $S \times S \times \ldots \times S$ [$k$ factors] is equipotent to $S$. And the set of subsets of $S$ of size $k$ is contained in the latter product. The cardinality result applied here is that, if $A,B$ are infinite sets, then $\operatorname{card}(A \times B)=\max (\operatorname{card}(A),\operatorname{card}(B)$. This is for example on the Wiki page about "cardinal numbers". So if both $A,B$ are the infinite set $S$ we get $|S \times S|=|S|.$
EDIT: You may also need to invoke Schroeder Bernstein and well ordering. That is, you can get an injection from $G_k$ into the product $S^k$ by using the well ordering on $S$ to map a specific subset $A$ of $S$ with $k$ elements to the specific product $(a_1,...,a_n)$ with the $a_j$ in their ordering from the well ordering on $S.$ And you can get another injection from $S$ back to the product $S^k$ by mapping $s$ to $(s,s,...,s)$. Then using Schroeder Bernstein you can conclude equipotence.
Another EDIT: My method only gives an injection from $G_k$ to S by first mapping $G_k$ via injection to $S^k$ and following that by a bijection from $S^k$ back to $S$. I can't see clearly how to get an injection from $S$ back to the set $G_k$ however, so I'd need to rethink. Luckily there's another answer posted already.